Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW the new documentation on the wiki [1] regarding dpkg-query was not
> entirely
> correct. It missed to strip of the "obsolete" keyword. I updated the wiki
> accordingly.
Ah, yes. Where is the meaning of that keyword documented?
Regards, Frank
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 14:51:00 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Le mercredi 30 mai 2007 à 07:53 +0300, Guillem Jover a écrit :
>>> If you need to retrieve the conffile info, which is why most of those
>>> packages are poking at
On Thursday 31 May 2007 19:03:41 Ian Jackson wrote:
> (Note that I'm adamantly opposed to the IMO crazy plans to replace the
> on-disk status database format. IMO the parsing needs to be sped up
> and the Descriptions moved into a separate file. But this is a
> discussion for a different list.)
Guillem Jover writes ("Parsing of dpkg status file considered harmful"):
> Please stop parsing dpkg status file from maintainer scripts. No
> package should assume its location or format (except for now for
> package managment frontends and the like, until there's a prope
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 15:22:59 +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 30.05.2007, 07:53 +0300 schrieb Guillem Jover:
> > I've been meaning to send this for some time, but latest docbook-xml
> > upload finally triggered it.
>
> Well, why didn't you send me a CC of this mail? I just stumble
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 14:51:00 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 30 mai 2007 à 07:53 +0300, Guillem Jover a écrit :
> > If you need to retrieve the conffile info, which is why most of those
> > packages are poking at the status file, please use something like:
> >
> > $ dpkg-query -W
Am Mittwoch, den 30.05.2007, 07:53 +0300 schrieb Guillem Jover:
> I've been meaning to send this for some time, but latest docbook-xml
> upload finally triggered it.
Well, why didn't you send me a CC of this mail? I just stumbled over
this by fluke.
> Please stop parsing dpkg status file from ma
Le mercredi 30 mai 2007 à 07:53 +0300, Guillem Jover a écrit :
> I've been meaning to send this for some time, but latest docbook-xml
> upload finally triggered it.
>
> Please stop parsing dpkg status file from maintainer scripts. No
> package should assume its location or format (except for now f
Hi,
I've been meaning to send this for some time, but latest docbook-xml
upload finally triggered it.
Please stop parsing dpkg status file from maintainer scripts. No
package should assume its location or format (except for now for
package managment frontends and the like, until there's a proper
9 matches
Mail list logo
