[Kurt Roeckx]
> I think we're discussing 2 things here, while I was only thinking
> about one of them:
> - Move scripts from rcS.d to rc[1-5].d
> - Removing rc[016].d/K* scripts
Could be.
> As far as I know, the only daemon we currently start in rcS.d
> (that keeps running) is udev.
There are m
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 02:58:54PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> [Kurt Roeckx]
> > I don't see why you think that would be a problem. Either the
> > init script in runlevel 1 is going to stop the service, or it
> > gets killed. And going back to runlevel 2 should start the same
> > servi
[Kurt Roeckx]
> I don't see why you think that would be a problem. Either the
> init script in runlevel 1 is going to stop the service, or it
> gets killed. And going back to runlevel 2 should start the same
> services as started otherwise in that runlevel.
The reason is that I remember some bu
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 09:42:42PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> [Kurt Roeckx]
> > And they should probably also be removed from /etc/rc1.d/ in that
> > case because it also uses sendsigs. Lintian warns about this as far
> > as I know.
>
> Perhaps. I am not quite sure how that will inte
[Kurt Roeckx]
> And they should probably also be removed from /etc/rc1.d/ in that
> case because it also uses sendsigs. Lintian warns about this as far
> as I know.
Perhaps. I am not quite sure how that will interact with runlevel
switching to and from runlevel 1. I am sure it is safe for runl
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 02:05:26PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> * Shutdown speed can be improved by removing scripts which only kill
>their daemon from /etc/rc[06].d/ and leaving it to the sendsigs
>script to kill all of them at the same time instead.
And they should probably also
6 matches
Mail list logo
