On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 09:39:12PM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote:
> If a package works, has no new upstream versions and doesn't get
> outdated policywise there is no need for a new version of the package
> just because we're making a new release.
The "making a release" may not be the best reason. Bu
David Starner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 09:39:12PM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote:
> > If a package works, has no new upstream versions and doesn't get
> > outdated policywise there is no need for a new version of the package
> > just because we're making a new release.
>
>
David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And what makes you think there has been no new upstream versions for all
> those packages?
Nothing. I commented on you general opinion.
--
Emacs er det eneste moderne styresystem der ikke er multitrådet.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 09:39:12PM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote:
> If a package works, has no new upstream versions and doesn't get
> outdated policywise there is no need for a new version of the package
> just because we're making a new release.
And what makes you think there has been no new upstre
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Otto Wyss) writes:
> IMO each package should at least once per release upload a status
> report. Also there was ample time for the transition of each package to
Disagreed. We should make package uploads just to make uploads.
If a package works, has no new upstream versions and
IMO each package should at least once per release upload a status
report. Also there was ample time for the transition of each package to
the pool. These are the reason behind the mailing to each maintainer of
packages still in Potato.
While most of the answers I got were positive, there were
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 03:57:26PM -0400, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> These packages have not needed any updates.
[...]
> Is it really necessary to make a new upload, rather
> than copying or linking these packages to the pool?
>
> I will make a new upload before the woody release if it is
>
On Wed 10 Apr 2002, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> Otto Wyss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Packages: dict-easton, dict-gazetteer, dict-hitchcock
>
> > The listed packages are still located in the Potato directory,
> > possibly because there wasn't any update necessary during the full
> > Woody develo
Otto Wyss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Packages: dict-easton, dict-gazetteer, dict-hitchcock
> The listed packages are still located in the Potato directory,
> possibly because there wasn't any update necessary during the full
> Woody development phase, but maybe also because there is no intere
9 matches
Mail list logo
