On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:19:33PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2016, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > * Jonathan Dowland [2016-06-24 09:24 +0100]:
> > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:10:50PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I've packaged neomutt for Debian. A Debian IT
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * Jonathan Dowland [2016-06-24 09:24 +0100]:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:10:50PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > > I am pleased to announce the availability of neomutt [0] packages for
> > > Debian. Hints for installation you'll find at
* Jonathan Dowland [2016-06-24 09:24 +0100]:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:10:50PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > I am pleased to announce the availability of neomutt [0] packages for
> > Debian. Hints for installation you'll find at [1].
> snip
> >
> > I've packaged neomutt for Debian. A D
hi
On 06/24/2016 05:32 PM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:59:00PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>> * Holger Levsen , 2016-06-24, 09:05:
I am suggesting that I remember what happened with mutt-kz.
>>> I have no idea what you are referring to here, but it reminds me to say
>>> tha
* Adam Borowski , 2016-06-24, 17:32:
I have no idea what you are referring to here, but it reminds me to
say that I think the name "mutt-kz" is a NO-GO. I know it's from the
authors initials, but… to me it sounds like "mutt-hitler" or probably
worse.
Send complaints to Karel's parents...
Eve
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:59:00PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Holger Levsen , 2016-06-24, 09:05:
> >>I am suggesting that I remember what happened with mutt-kz.
> >I have no idea what you are referring to here, but it reminds me to say
> >that I think the name "mutt-kz" is a NO-GO. I know it's fr
* Holger Levsen , 2016-06-24, 09:05:
I am suggesting that I remember what happened with mutt-kz.
I have no idea what you are referring to here, but it reminds me to say
that I think the name "mutt-kz" is a NO-GO. I know it's from the
authors initials, but… to me it sounds like "mutt-hitler" or
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 07:33:40AM -0300, Tiago Ilieve wrote:
> His package is in the archive for over two years[3] and
> looks like no one felt offended enough to fill a bug before.
I only noticed mutt-kz three months ago…
And I'd also be fine with a rename to mutt-karel or mutt-karel-zak.
-
Holger,
On 24 June 2016 at 06:05, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I have no idea what you are referring to here, but it reminds me to say
> that I think the name "mutt-kz" is a NO-GO. I know it's from the authors
> initials, but… to me it sounds like "mutt-hitler" or probably worse.
Wait... What? So are
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 09:05:16AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> And I don't think this is a german thing (well…) - the term "KZ" is
> known by millions of non german speaking people, cause their loved ones
> suffered and died there.
s#non german speaking people#non german speaking and german spea
Hi Victor,
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:30:16AM +0200, Víctor M. Jáquez L. wrote:
> I'm sorry, I didn't know. Thanks.
> The name comes from the main author of the project: Karel Zak.
[...]
> Independently of the badly chosen name, I accepted to deprecate mutt-kz in
> favor or neomutt.
wow, very coo
On 06/24/16 at 09:05am, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 08:44:18AM +, Clint Adams wrote:
> > I am suggesting that I remember what happened with mutt-kz.
>
> I have no idea what you are referring to here, but it reminds me to say
> that I think the name "mutt-kz" is a NO-GO. I kn
Ian Jackson writes:
> I don't think there is anything wrong with having a competing package.
There is. I'm fairly sure the security team will not be happy...
Packaging the *same* project twice seems even more useless busy work for
them than packaging lots of forks of the same project (which some p
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 08:44:18AM +, Clint Adams wrote:
> I am suggesting that I remember what happened with mutt-kz.
I have no idea what you are referring to here, but it reminds me to say
that I think the name "mutt-kz" is a NO-GO. I know it's from the authors
initials, but… to me it sounds
* Clint Adams , 2016-06-24, 08:44:
I am suggesting that I remember what happened with mutt-kz.
What happened with mutt-kz?
--
Jakub Wilk
Clint Adams writes ("Re: Neomutt packages available"):
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 09:41:38AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > You seem to be either suggesting that the mutt people should be prevented
> > from
> > their pre-existing plan to move to neomutt
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 09:41:38AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> You seem to be either suggesting that the mutt people should be prevented from
> their pre-existing plan to move to neomutt, or we should have two neomutt
> packages in Debian at the same time.
I am suggesting that I remember what
Clint Adams writes ("Re: Neomutt packages available"):
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 09:24:27AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > Rather than work with the existing team Elimar has persisted with
> > efforts to package neomutt separately and has even suggested a *differe
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 08:30:22AM +, Clint Adams wrote:
> Territorial bullshit.
You seem to be either suggesting that the mutt people should be prevented from
their pre-existing plan to move to neomutt, or we should have two neomutt
packages in Debian at the same time.
--
Jonathan Dowland
P
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 09:24:27AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> Rather than work with the existing team Elimar has persisted with
> efforts to package neomutt separately and has even suggested a *different*
> team is set up to maintain neomutt, versus pkg-mutt.
Good.
> A fork by any other nam
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:10:50PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> I am pleased to announce the availability of neomutt [0] packages for
> Debian. Hints for installation you'll find at [1].
snip
>
> I've packaged neomutt for Debian. A Debian ITP [2] is filed.
> [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b
Hi all,
I am pleased to announce the availability of neomutt [0] packages for
Debian. Hints for installation you'll find at [1].
I've packaged neomutt for Debian. A Debian ITP [2] is filed. The
binaries are build in a sid environment. The sources are fetched
from [3]. The neomutt branch is used.
On Sunday 25 November 2007, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
> On 25/11/2007, Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have now got packages building and available from buildserver.net
>
> There is no man page, desktop icon or menu.
Thanks Jeffery,
I didn't say they were ready for release to unstabl
On 25/11/2007, Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have now got packages building and available from buildserver.net
There is no man page, desktop icon or menu.
Regards
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTE
I have now got packages building and available from buildserver.net
http://status.buildserver.net/packages/status.php?email=&packages=merkaartor&arches=&dists=&subdist=pkg-kde-extra
http://archive.buildserver.net/pool/main/m/merkaartor/
Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
y
out the modutil packages available at:
http://packages.debian.org/experimental/base/modutils
If you want to test a new release for sysklogd fixing bugs and introducing
new features, please try out the sysklogd packages available at:
http://people.debian.org/~jfs/NMU/sysklogd/
(these are not in ex
I've fixed a couple of problems that were detected with the first
version. Today's version is available from the www.murphy.nl site.
Line for sources.list:
http://www.murphy.nl/~paul/debian isdnutils/
This is the changelog extract:
* I've taken the newest upstream CVS version again, which inc
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 02:52:33PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
>
> [puzzled]
>
> For some reason the .dsc file was the old one. I've uploaded the correct
> one, so everything should be OK now. Thanks for the warning.
>
No problem. I see they have been installed now.
--
On Thu 07 Sep 2000, Paul Slootman wrote:
> These packages have been uploaded to the "experimental" distribution
> (but not yet installed at this moment, maybe today?),
FYI: I got got mail from the installer that it's been put into
experimental.
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ht
Today, Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu 07 Sep 2000, Andreas Fuchs wrote:
>> Today, I <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Calling isdnrep is not working well: it's looking for the zone files
>> > in /usr/lib/isdn/zone, but they are in /usr/lib/isdn/:
> In /usr/share/isdn/ actually.
On Thu 07 Sep 2000, Andreas Fuchs wrote:
> You see, isdnconfig tries to copy from
> /usr/share/doc/isdnutils/examples/defaults/ipppd.DEVICE to
> /etc/isdn/ipppd.$device.
>
> Now, ipppd.DEVICE is named ipppd.DEVICE.gz (arghl, automatic gzipping
> in docs dir?). And it resides in /usr/share/doc/ipp
On Thu 07 Sep 2000, Andreas Fuchs wrote:
> Today, I <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Calling isdnrep is not working well: it's looking for the zone files
> > in /usr/lib/isdn/zone, but they are in /usr/lib/isdn/:
In /usr/share/isdn/ actually.
> Oh, silly me. I had configured isdnrep to look specif
(I already replied to this, but I figured that would be "better style"
than replying to my own mails three times in a row.)
Today, Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please let me know if you use this version, and keep me informed of
> ANYTHING, good or bad. I *do* mean anything, like spe
Today, I <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Calling isdnrep is not working well: it's looking for the zone files
> in /usr/lib/isdn/zone, but they are in /usr/lib/isdn/:
Oh, silly me. I had configured isdnrep to look specifically there, in
/etc/isdn/isdn.conf. Fixed this now, let's see if it works...
Today, Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu 07 Sep 2000, Andreas Fuchs wrote:
>> Today, Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> deb http://www.murphy.nl/~paul/debian isdnutils/
>>> After this, "apt-get update; apt-get install ipppd isdnlog-data"
>>> should install isdnutils, ipp
On Thu 07 Sep 2000, Andreas Fuchs wrote:
> Today, Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've been promising this for a while, but now it's happened:
> > The latest version of isdn4k-utils has been packaged.
>
> Yippie!
:-)
> > deb http://www.murphy.nl/~paul/debian isdnutils/
> > After thi
Today, Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been promising this for a while, but now it's happened:
> The latest version of isdn4k-utils has been packaged.
Yippie!
[...]
> deb http://www.murphy.nl/~paul/debian isdnutils/
> After this, "apt-get update; apt-get install ipppd isdnlog-da
On Fri 08 Sep 2000, Michael Beattie wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 07:40:02AM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
> > These packages have been uploaded to the "experimental" distribution
> > (but not yet installed at this moment, maybe today?),
> > but are also available by using the following line in /e
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 07:40:02AM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
> These packages have been uploaded to the "experimental" distribution
> (but not yet installed at this moment, maybe today?),
> but are also available by using the following line in /etc/apt/sources.list:
I added the override entries
I've been promising this for a while, but now it's happened:
The latest version of isdn4k-utils has been packaged.
I'm calling this experimental, because things probably WILL go wrong
here and there. However, I'm using it (at least parts of it), and it
works for me. Be sure to backup
My apologies if you replied to the mail quoted below; I never received one.
As far as I can tell, Red Hat's webpages have not been updated with the
corrected information. Are there any plans to do so?
On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 12:30:04AM -0400, branden wrote:
> Hi Preston,
>
> In Red Hat's recent
> http://users.compagnet.be/mechanix/debian/
>
Oops, that should be
http://users.compaqnet.be/mechanix/debian/
Also, the upload is done now.
Hi,
following my ITP I have made some packages for xracer. They are
available from
http://users.compagnet.be/mechanix/debian/
(I'm uploading right now)
I'm waiting for my application as a developer to be processed; in the
meanwhile maybe someone could sponsor them?
There are a few issues howev
On Sat, 29 Nov 1997, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Other available packages also for new maintainers:
>
> syslinux Boot loader for Debian Disks
Sorry, but *I* am the maintainer of `syslinux', and I don't
want to orphan it. So, I'll go on maintaining it, if noone objects.
--
Juan Ces
> pftp FTP client
Got it!
--
David Welton http://www.efn.org/~davidw
Debian GNU/Linux - www.debian.org
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
On Jun 17, Larry 'Daffy' Daffner wrote
> svgalib (svgalib1, svgalib1-bin, svgalib1-dev, aout-svgalib which
> probably doesn't need any further updates)
> zgv
I'll take zgv, and I'm quite happy to have the svgalib ones too if nobody
else wants them.
Cheers,
&E
--
Andy Mortimer, [EMAIL PRO
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Larry 'Daffy' Daffner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> svgalib (svgalib1, svgalib1-bin, svgalib1-dev, aout-svgalib which
> probably doesn't need any further updates)
> zgv
I don't want those because I avoid svgalib and everything to do with it.
> xco
It is with great regret that I must give up my involvement with
Debian. Between the large volumes of list mail every day and the other
commitments in my life, I never seem to have proper time to devote to
my packages or other projects of mine that have been on the back
burner forever.
Therefore,
I have taken over the installation system from Ian Murdock, and need
some time to work on that. I'm going to convert it to ELF, go to a
one-floppy install, and eventually rewrite the installation interface
in C++, with multi-language support, using Ncurses forms. I need to do
work on the "base" pac
49 matches
Mail list logo
