Hi Thomas,
Thomas> I am still using an "acct_6.3.2-2_i386.deb" package that I
Thomas> compiled on a 2.1.96 kernel. It works fine with the 2.2 kernel
Thomas> series for me.
Thanks, that is another good data point.
Which version of glibc are you running / did you compile against? Glibc 2
Hi,
> GNU acct is still broken for 2.2 kernels. I thought a recompile would fix it,
> but it doesn't. The upstream author, with whom I generally had very good
> (albeit sporadic) contact is MIA. AFAICT the other dists don't distribute
> acct.
I am still using an "acct_6.3.2-2_i386.deb" package
On Thu, May 13, 1999 at 09:43:58PM -0400, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Which kernel-sources, running kernel, libc6, egcc, ... are you using ? I
> think on my build machine it is
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> dpkg -l kernel-image-2.2.7 kernel-source-2.2.5 libc6
> egcc|grep ^ii
> ii kernel-image-2. edd
>
> Well, I wrote something simple in Perl for the last package, but Shaleh says
> it fails on his box. What does /usr/sbin/compare_kernel_version say for you?
> [ Note that I turned the $debug flag on here: ]
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> /tmp/compare_kernel_version 2.0
> 2.2 ? 2.0
> 2.2 >= 2.0
> [E
Robert> [sorry for not getting to this message sooner]
No sweat.
Dirk> GNU acct is still broken for 2.2 kernels. I thought a recompile would
Dirk> fix it, but it doesn't.
Robert> Not true:
[..]
Well, that is good news. I _thought_ I had it working as well. Maybe I just
messed up o
[sorry for not getting to this message sooner]
Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>GNU acct is still broken for 2.2 kernels. I thought a recompile would fix it,
>but it doesn't.
Not true:
frantica:~/src/acct-6.3.5$ lastcomm | head
root ?? 0.00 secs We
>acct is user login/use accounting, NOT money matters.
oops. Yeah that was Xacct or something like that. Oh well never mind.
===
Amateur Radio, when all else fails!
http://www.qsl.net/wa2mze
Debian Gnu Linux, Live Free or .
_
Do Yo
acct is user login/use accounting, NOT money matters.
>
>GNU acct is still broken for 2.2 kernels. I thought a >recompile would
>fix it,
>but it doesn't. The upstream author, with whom I >generally had very
>good
>(albeit sporadic) contact is MIA. AFAICT the other >dists don't
>distribute
>acct.
>The package needs a kernel hacker type who can debug
GNU acct is still broken for 2.2 kernels. I thought a recompile would fix it,
but it doesn't. The upstream author, with whom I generally had very good
(albeit sporadic) contact is MIA. AFAICT the other dists don't distribute
acct.
The package needs a kernel hacker type who can debug and hopeful
10 matches
Mail list logo
