Re: Package flow scenarios

2005-03-14 Thread Bdale Garbee
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Schmitt) writes: >> 4.2) the package fails to build. This used to be a RC critical FTBFS, >> but is not so anymore. The porter are responsible for fixing the bug and >> uploading a fixed package to unstable, as they do now. > > Wouldn't it be better: "The porter are re

Package flow scenarios (was: Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting)

2005-03-14 Thread David Schmitt
[Sven, pPlease teach you and your mutt the use of reply-to-list] On Monday 14 March 2005 14:06, Sven Luther wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 01:02:34PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote: [...] > No, you didn't understand. You are right. > let's tell the plan again : > > 1) people upload to unstable