Re: PING of Maintainer Address

1997-06-14 Thread Richard Kettlewell
>Just to be clear... Are they obsolete (i.e. should be removed) or >are they orphaned (i.e. no longer supported)? repair was a bug-reporting script I wrote a long time ago, it never really achieve all the functionality intended and is probably out of date with respect to the modern bug system. I

PING of Maintainer Address

1997-06-14 Thread Richard Kettlewell
I've had these messages before, and followed the instructions for stating that I no longer maintain the packages in question. But they still keep appearing. Can somebody *please* sort this out, and tell me that they have done so? (Both packages are, AFAIK, utterly obsolete and should not exist a

Re: PING of Maintainer Address

1997-06-14 Thread Brian White
> I've had these messages before, and followed the instructions for > stating that I no longer maintain the packages in question. But they > still keep appearing. These things tend to get overriden by the automated scripts. > Can somebody *please* sort this out, and tell me that they have don

Re: PING of Maintainer Address

1997-06-14 Thread Brian White
> >Just to be clear... Are they obsolete (i.e. should be removed) or > >are they orphaned (i.e. no longer supported)? > > repair was a bug-reporting script I wrote a long time ago, it never > really achieve all the functionality intended and is probably out of > date with respect to the modern bu