Lang: Rust/Python
Description : OpenPGP in Python using Sequoia PGP
This library provides OpenPGP facilities in Python through the Sequoia PGP
library.
Hi!
Daniel thanks for all your work on the OpenPGP working group,
and on SOP! :)
On Wed, 2023-12-20 at 22:16:28 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> # What Can Debian Do About This?
>
> I've attempted to chart one possible path out of part of this situation
> by proposing a minimized, simplified
Hi,
More metapackages will make transitions harder though, I believe we want
to avoid that.
In what way would transitions become harder?
The alternatives system has "manual" and "automatic" modes for each
group, these would probably correspond to "manually installed" and
"automatically in
Enrico Zini wrote:
>
>I maintain critical code that calls out to gnupg, in part because at the
>time I wrote it that was the only thing available, and in part because
>I'm supposed to offer the broadest possible compatibility with what
>other people in Debian are using, so if everyone else seems to
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 at 03:01, Simon Richter wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 12/28/23 04:28, Luca Boccassi wrote:
>
> > if you want to activate a new alternative, you have to download a new
> > package that provides it anyway, so there's no difference. Subsequent
> > switches will use the cached package, and
Hi,
On 12/28/23 04:28, Luca Boccassi wrote:
if you want to activate a new alternative, you have to download a new
package that provides it anyway, so there's no difference. Subsequent
switches will use the cached package, and if you have issues
downloading a 3 kilobytes metapackage then just en
Metapackage approach is not the same for many reasons.
First, I have seen Debian installations which doesn’t have internet access, but
setup with many alternatives of the same application (e.g.: Java).
Moreover, apt automatically purges its cache after a successful transaction.
As I said in
On Sun, 24 Dec 2023 at 22:48, Stephan Seitz wrote:
>
> Am So, Dez 24, 2023 at 10:06:09 +0100 schrieb Gioele Barabucci:
> >After the installation there would be no /usr/bin/gpg. Once the user
> >installs, say, ggp-is-gnupg then /usr/bin/gpg will point to
> >/usr/bin/gpg-gnupg. Users (and scripts) a
However, shoehorning X-is-X to apt for replacing alternatives is a very
unoptimal (and even backwards) approach, because it’s not only for simple
applications. Some of the daily alternatives I see are:
- x-www-Browser
- java (and the whole toolchain)
- editor
- vi
- pager
… The list goes on and
Am So, Dez 24, 2023 at 10:06:09 +0100 schrieb Gioele Barabucci:
After the installation there would be no /usr/bin/gpg. Once the user
installs, say, ggp-is-gnupg then /usr/bin/gpg will point to
/usr/bin/gpg-gnupg. Users (and scripts) are still free to install the
And if you want to change it,
On 24/12/23 08:54, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
While we are on the topic of alternatives, I hope to see the
maintscript-based /etc/alternatives paradigm deprecated in favor of
the package-based X-is-X paradigm introduced by `python-is-python3`.
They have different use-cases. alternatives allows
On 23/12/2023 14:34, Gioele Barabucci wrote:
On 22/12/23 00:40, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
If you're asking about using /etc/alternatives or something like that to
provide some sort of generic swapping capability, or a dpkg Provides:,
such that /usr/bin/gpg on some systems would point toward t
On Sat, 23 Dec 2023 at 18:43, Gioele Barabucci wrote:
>
> On 22/12/23 00:40, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > If you're asking about using /etc/alternatives or something like that to
> > provide some sort of generic swapping capability, or a dpkg Provides:,
> > such that /usr/bin/gpg on some systems
On 17086 March 1977, Gioele Barabucci wrote:
While we are on the topic of alternatives, I hope to see the
maintscript-based /etc/alternatives paradigm deprecated in favor of
the
package-based X-is-X paradigm introduced by `python-is-python3`.
In this scenario gnupg will ship gpg as /usr/bin/
On 22/12/23 00:40, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
If you're asking about using /etc/alternatives or something like that to
provide some sort of generic swapping capability, or a dpkg Provides:,
such that /usr/bin/gpg on some systems would point toward the
"chameleon", i would want to see some signifi
for those new features?
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
a internally)?
>
> Would it work as a stop-gap measure while the Debian infrastructure
> moves from GnuPG to something else (to `sop`, for instance)?
>
> [1] https://gitlab.com/sequoia-pgp/sequoia-chameleon-gnupg not yet in
> Debian AFAIK
Thanks for pointing this out! It looks in
Interesting point in this talk: The APT team is already working on non-
PGP signatures.
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Apt/Spec/AptSign
I can see the advantages of that for release signatures which use a
rarely changing set of keys.
However, I do not see any good alternative for PGP for personal
t some day, thanks
to you and others like you, those >=5 people at a DebConf will really
look at me wide-eyed and show me a way out of the pit.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
or gpg
that uses sequoia internally)?
Would it work as a stop-gap measure while the Debian infrastructure
moves from GnuPG to something else (to `sop`, for instance)?
Regards,
[1] https://gitlab.com/sequoia-pgp/sequoia-chameleon-gnupg not yet in
Debian AFAIK
--
Gioele Barabucci
at we need and has a saneimplementation. If that means turning away from GnuPG, so be it. Thetransition will be painful anyway.Christoph
publicKey - MesoSecurity@protonmail.ch - 0xA98C9ECA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
refore, my answer to "How can Debian deal with this [schism]?" is
basically: Debian needs to change things in that area anyway, let's
first find an implementation that provides what we need and has a sane
implementation. If that means turning away from GnuPG, so be it. The
transition will
erse implementations, and
substantial public interoperability testing. That means OpenPGP.
To be clear, the IETF OpenPGP working group actively solicited input
from the GnuPG team, and tried to work with the project as one
significant implementation among many. But ultimately, the GnuPG
project de
On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 23:00:41 +0100, Joerg Jaspert
wrote:
>On 17077 March 1977, Stephan Verbücheln wrote:
>
>> How can Debian deal with this? Should Debian intervene to prevent the
>> worst?
>
>We, as Debian, look and wait what comes out. And then *MAY* at some
>point decide to add (or switch to) a
On 17077 March 1977, Stephan Verbücheln wrote:
How can Debian deal with this? Should Debian intervene to prevent the
worst?
We, as Debian, look and wait what comes out. And then *MAY* at some
point decide to add (or switch to) a new thing, if that appears better.
Also, it will be a high bar f
Hi,
Personal view here.
Stephan Verbücheln wrote on 14/12/2023 at 11:29:17+0100:
> [[PGP Signed Part:No public key for 603542590A3C7C62 created at
> 2023-12-14T11:29:17+0100 using EDDSA]]
> Hello everyone
>
> As you probably know, Debian relies heavily on GnuPG for var
Proton Mail
(maintaining OpenPGP.JS) and Sequoia PGP (free implementation in Rust).
The disagreements are about details such as algorithms and file formats
which make both standards incompatible.
How can Debian deal with this? Should Debian intervene to prevent the
worst?
Regards
Stephan
Hi,
On 9/1/23 08:10, Yadd wrote:
> there is an issue opened for that (#1014333), contributions welcome !
Ah, thanks for the info!
--
Ben Westover
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 9/1/23 08:10, Ben Westover wrote:
Hello,
I add PGP verification to my debian/watch files wherever possible so
that if upstream has a signature on their tarball, it can be verified.
I've seen a few projects now that choose to include a clearsigned file
that contains the sha256sums o
Hello,
I add PGP verification to my debian/watch files wherever possible so
that if upstream has a signature on their tarball, it can be verified.
I've seen a few projects now that choose to include a clearsigned file
that contains the sha256sums of all their tarballs and binaries inste
/archlinux-keyring
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Arch Linux PGP keyring
The archlinux-keyring project holds PGP packet material and tooling
(keyringctl) to create the distribution keyring for Arch Linux. The keyring is
used by pacman to establish the web of
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jacob Adams
* Package name: pgp-clean-room
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Jacob Adams
* URL : https://salsa.debian.org/tookmund-guest/pgpcr
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Python
Description : PGP Clean
Greetings,
Any debian developers attending the OSCON conference in Portland,
Oregon next week that would be willing to meet me to sign my PGP key?
Kind regards,
Debora Velarde Babb
IBM Linux Technology Center
deb...@linux.ibm.com and dvela...@us.ibm.com
On 02/28/2018 06:18 PM, Ulrike Uhlig wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Jacob Adams:
>
>> I am looking to create an application for the PGP Clean Room Live CD
>> that walks a user through setting up a set of USB flash drives or sd
>> cards as a raid disk, generating new GPG keys, s
Hi!
Jacob Adams:
> I am looking to create an application for the PGP Clean Room Live CD
> that walks a user through setting up a set of USB flash drives or sd
> cards as a raid disk, generating new GPG keys, storing them there, and
> then exporting subkeys either on a separate USB st
te this process. Many live cds like TAILS
can be manipulated for this purpose, but are not designed for it and
require quite a bit of space for what is otherwise a relatively small
amount of information.
I am looking to create an application for the PGP Clean Room Live CD
that walks a user through
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "W. Martin Borgert"
* Package name : gajim-pgp
Version : 1.2.0
Upstream Author : Philipp Hörist
* URL : https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim-plugins/wikis/pgpplugin
* License : GPL3
Programming Lang: Python
D
This can now be used, command line only for the moment, as described in
my blog[1] about it
If anybody wants to help take this further please join the list[2] I set
up for it
Regards,
Daniel
1. https://danielpocock.com/dvd-based-clean-room-for-pgp-and-pki
2. https://lists.alioth.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 25/04/16 23:06, Christian Seiler wrote:
> On 04/25/2016 08:54 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> On 25/04/16 19:03, Christian Seiler wrote:
>>>> Does the workflow make sense?
>>>
>>> In principle yes, h
On 04/25/2016 08:54 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> On 25/04/16 19:03, Christian Seiler wrote:
>>> Does the workflow make sense?
>>
>> In principle yes, however it doesn't quite fit with my the
>> workflow I'd like to use something like that for: my master key is
>> on a two separate SD cards, and I onl
On 25/04/16 21:51, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:15:02AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> There are various blogs guiding people to use a Debian Live CD for
>> managing PGP master keys
>>
>> Has anybody thought of making a dedicated live CD image for
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:15:02AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> There are various blogs guiding people to use a Debian Live CD for
> managing PGP master keys
>
> Has anybody thought of making a dedicated live CD image for this
> purpose, with some kind of PGP quick setup wizard an
On 25/04/16 19:03, Christian Seiler wrote:
> On 04/25/2016 06:38 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> On 25/04/16 17:34, Christian Seiler wrote:
>>> Am 2016-04-25 17:24, schrieb Daniel Pocock:
On 25/04/16 16:23, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 04:03:26PM +0200, Daniel Pocock
>
On 04/25/2016 06:38 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> On 25/04/16 17:34, Christian Seiler wrote:
>> Am 2016-04-25 17:24, schrieb Daniel Pocock:
>>> On 25/04/16 16:23, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 04:03:26PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> I had already made up some live CDs for read
On 25/04/16 17:34, Christian Seiler wrote:
> Am 2016-04-25 17:24, schrieb Daniel Pocock:
>> On 25/04/16 16:23, Holger Levsen wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 04:03:26PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
I had already made up some live CDs for ready-to-run VoIP and
remote hands purposes, so I
Am 2016-04-25 17:24, schrieb Daniel Pocock:
On 25/04/16 16:23, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 04:03:26PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
I had already made up some live CDs for ready-to-run VoIP and remote
hands purposes, so I can probably do some of what is required, but it
seems li
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 05:24:21PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Another interesting idea may be having an application that runs in Tails
> to download other people's keys from key servers, automatically using a
> different Tor connection for each download.
apt show parcimonie | $magic
Description
On 25/04/16 16:23, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 04:03:26PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> I had already made up some live CDs for ready-to-run VoIP and remote hands
>> purposes, so I can probably do some of what is required, but it seems like a
>> good idea to avoid duplicating
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 04:03:26PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> I had already made up some live CDs for ready-to-run VoIP and remote hands
> purposes, so I can probably do some of what is required, but it seems like a
> good idea to avoid duplicating any other efforts in this area too.
shouldn
On 25 April 2016 14:55:07 CEST, Ian Jackson
wrote:
>Daniel Pocock writes ("dedicated live CD for PGP master key
>management"):
>> Some specific things that the live image could do:
>> - verifying there is no network connection, no DHCP daemon,
>> automa
Daniel Pocock writes ("dedicated live CD for PGP master key management"):
> Some specific things that the live image could do:
> - verifying there is no network connection, no DHCP daemon,
> automatically shutting down if a network connection becomes active
> - formatting 2
There are various blogs guiding people to use a Debian Live CD for
managing PGP master keys
Has anybody thought of making a dedicated live CD image for this
purpose, with some kind of PGP quick setup wizard and attempting to
enforce a sane and secure workflow?
One page I came across suggested
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Ondřej Surý"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: openpgpkey-milter
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Paul Wouters
* URL : ftp://ftp.nohats.ca/openpgpkey-milter/
* License : LGPL-3
P
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I request assistance with maintaining the gnupg package. The package is
team-maintained via alioth (pkg-gnupg group).
Regards, Daniel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux
10
> > Upstream Author : Alistair Crooks ,
> > Ben Laurie, Rachel Willmer
> > * URL : http://www.netbsd.org/
> > * License : BSD
> > Programming Lang: C
> > Description : PGP signing, verification, encryption and dec
t; * URL : http://www.netbsd.org/
> * License : BSD
> Programming Lang: C
> Description : PGP signing, verification, encryption and decryption
> program
>
> The netpgp library is a BSD-licensed library for managing PGP keys.
>
> On top of the library, the n
Description : PGP signing, verification, encryption and decryption program
The netpgp library is a BSD-licensed library for managing PGP keys.
On top of the library, the netpgp command can digitally sign files and
verify that the signatures attached to files were signed by a given
user identifier
On 12163 March 1977, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> As announced that the end of April[0] we have dropped support for v3
> keys from the Debian keyring. At present this means debian-keyring.pgp
> still exists, but is an empty file. Once we have confirmation from DSA +
> FTP master that they have update
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 09:18:28PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> This works because v3 keys[0] use MD5 as a fingerprint algorithm, which
> is 128 bits long (and 32 hex characters) while v4 keys use SHA1, which
> is 160 bits long. It only prints out one of the UIDs on the key, not
> all of them.
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 11:01:14PM +0200, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 01:57:24PM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > I have sent numerous mails over the past year to try and chase DDs with
> > v3 keys to generate a new v4 key that is linked into to our web of
> > trust. In th
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 01:57:24PM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> I have sent numerous mails over the past year to try and chase DDs with
> v3 keys to generate a new v4 key that is linked into to our web of
> trust. In that time we've gone from 200 v3 keys down to 20. While it
Have there been a
each UID on a PGP
keyring
This program allows you to sign all the keys in a keyring without
requiring separate invocations for each key. Many signing parties
distribute a party keyring containing all of the participants keys.
This utility can reduce the time spent signing a large about of keys
based password manager using PGP-encryption
This program is a ncurses based console tool to manage passwords and store them
public key encrypted in a file - even for more than one person. The encryption
is handled via GnuPG so the programs data can be accessed via gpg as well, in
case you want to
Hi,
do you maintain a separate key for signing packages etc. or do you use a
subkey and a separate user id on your usual key? I tend to use the
subkey approach. Any opinions on this? Best practices?
Michael
--
biff4emacsen - A biff-like tool for (X)Emacs
http://www.c0t0d0s0.de/biff4emacsen/biff
der header is not related to
this. A correctly configured server will reject your mail.
> Is my mail setup still considered "broken" ?
Totally.
ok. I've reconfigured it to use a smart host. caff email is working now.
thanks for the help!
-Tim
--
ciao,
Marco
-BEGIN
On Mon, 08 May 2006, Tim Olsen wrote:
> On 5/8/06, Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Mon, 08 May 2006, Tim Olsen wrote:
> >
> >> Is this something that should be fixed in perl's mailtools or is my
> >> MTA setup not kosher? I prefer to have my MTA send mail because my
> >> internal
On May 08, Tim Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's because it's behind a firewall like I said. My mail works
> fine, as long as the Sender: field is not set.
No, the envelope sender is wrong and the Sender header is not related to
this. A correctly configured server will reject your mail.
On 5/8/06, Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 08 May 2006, Tim Olsen wrote:
> Is this something that should be fixed in perl's mailtools or is my
> MTA setup not kosher? I prefer to have my MTA send mail because my
> internal networks smart host is overloaded.
>
> host ALUM-
On Mon, 08 May 2006, Tim Olsen wrote:
> Is this something that should be fixed in perl's mailtools or is my
> MTA setup not kosher? I prefer to have my MTA send mail because my
> internal networks smart host is overloaded.
>
> host ALUM-2.mit.edu [18.7.21.145]: 553 5.1.8 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
ress [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not exist
-- This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. --
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tim by lemonchord.limewire.com with local (Exim 4.62)
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
id 1Fd9Y6-00
Re: Davide G. M. Salvetti in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I was trying to upload them from people to ftp-master with ftp, maybe I
> forgot to set the binary mode on (though I seem to recall that between
> Unix systems it shouldn't matter).
Uhm, use dput? It also does some checks on the .changes to see if
> AT == Anthony Towns [2006-2-8]
AT> On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 04:28:19PM +0100, Davide G. M. Salvetti wrote:
>> If you are willing to help, you can find all needed files on
>> people:~salve/pub/apt/.
AT> I uploaded those files via ftp, and it worked fine. My only guess is
AT> the changes you
w why katie does not find the signature? Am I doing
> something stupid?
The queued gives that error if you don't have three lines like "-BEGIN
PGP" and "-END PGP".
> If you are willing to help, you can find all needed files on
> people:~salve/pub/apt/.
"Davide G. M. Salvetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you are willing to help, you can find all needed files on
> people:~salve/pub/apt/.
s/pub/public_html/
I didn't find the culprit, unfortunately.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Bioch
lling to help, you can find all needed files on
people:~salve/pub/apt/.
--
Thanks, Davide
--- Begin Message ---
auctex_11.82-1_i386.changes isn't signed with PGP/GnuPG
Removing auctex_11.82-1_i386.changes, but keeping its associated files for now.
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libpgp-sign-perl
Version : 0.19
Upstream Author : Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/software/pgp-sign/
* License : GPL
n-devel-0010/msg00683.html & Fups.
yours,
peter
--
PGP signed and encrypted messages preferred.
http://www.palfrader.org/
pgpFeVk2QwW9n.pgp
Description: PGP signature
on -devel perhaps a
> month or two ago).
I can't find it in the archive...
Pawel
--
(___) | Pawel Wiecek --- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <+48603240006> |
< o o > | WWW: http://www.coven.vmh.net/ [ Debian GNU/Linux developer ] |
\ ^ / | GPG/PGP key:
yours,
peter
--
PGP signed and encrypted messages preferred.
http://www.palfrader.org/
pgpo7LWgjJNJK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
|
< o o > | WWW: http://www.coven.vmh.net/ [ Debian GNU/Linux developer ] |
\ ^ / | GPG/PGP key: http://www.coven.vmh.net/personal/pgpkey.html |
(") | * Never explain. * |
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 10:55:31AM +0200, joost witteveen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Until recently I only had a PGP key, and as
> suggested by /usr/share/doc/debian-keyring/README.gz, I've
> now generated a GPG one, signed it with my PGP key, and
> submitted it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ectory,
and run
~maor/dinstall/dinstall -n fakeroot_.changes
That should provide an explanation.
> Is there anything else I need to do? (Sign for the time being with
> my pgp key, wait longer, or send bribes to keyring-maint?)
>
> (I haven't had a responce from my message t
Hi,
Until recently I only had a PGP key, and as
suggested by /usr/share/doc/debian-keyring/README.gz, I've
now generated a GPG one, signed it with my PGP key, and
submitted it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A couple of hours later I uploaded a package (fakeroot_0.4.4-5)
signed with my new GPG keys.
xample:
gpg --export 0xSomeKeyID | pgpk -a
pgpk -x 0xSomeKeyID | gpg --import
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian GNU/Linux developer
GnuPG: 2048g/3F9C2A43 - 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC 44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3
PGP 2.6: 2048R/50BDA0ED - E8 D6 84 81 E3 A8 BB 77 8E E2 29
Joseph Carter wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 07:45:23PM +0200, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
> > Is it possible to use a key created by pgp5 for package signing ? The
> > key works for me when I use it with gpg, both the opposite is not true
> > (e.g. pgp5 is unable to verify a signature created with
a key and use only one key for all
> purposes.
This should be OK, GPG implements the OpenPGP spec, and so does PGP5. If
you used a new enough PGP version you should have no problems reading GPG
signed things. So long as GPG properly understands your key it is fine to
use.
Jason
page.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian GNU/Linux developer
GnuPG: 2048g/3F9C2A43 - 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC 44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3
PGP 2.6: 2048R/50BDA0ED - E8 D6 84 81 E3 A8 BB 77 8E E2 29 96 C9 44 5F BE
Hi all
Is it possible to use a key created by pgp5 for package signing ? The
key works for me when I use it with gpg, both the opposite is not true
(e.g. pgp5 is unable to verify a signature created with a gpg key). I am
no maintainer yet and so I want to start cleanly. What is the "right"
way if
to have been thankfully
destroyed and I don't have to injure someone.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian GNU/Linux developer
GnuPG: 2048g/3F9C2A43 - 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC 44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3
PGP 2.6: 2048R/50BDA0ED - E8 D6 84 81 E3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Joseph> Unfortunately gpg-rsa is broken. It installs a sh wrapper
Joseph> (yes, sh) that breaks gpg entirely.
What do you mean a sh wrapper?
% dpkg -L gpg-rsa
/.
/usr
/usr/lib
/usr/lib/gnupg
/usr/lib/gnupg/rsa
/usr/doc
/usr/doc/gpg-rsa
/usr/doc/g
h) that
breaks gpg entirely.
There's also an issue that gpg-idea recommends gpg-rsa which gpg-rsaref
does not provide.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian GNU/Linux developer
GnuPG: 2048g/3F9C2A43 - 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC 44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3
PGP 2.6: 2048R
ert Akkerman.
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/
pgpUh81rW0G0Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Can someone please let me know the best way to switch from PGP to
> GNUPG? I'd like to start signing my Debian packages with GNUPG. Also,
> am I going to have to go through the "proof of identity" process again,
> or can I use my existing PGP key (which is on the Debian key
nd add
the pgp keyrings... (gpg-rsa version 2)
SRH
--
Steve Haslam Debian GNU/Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gnome-libs, gnome-core, gnome-control-center, gdm, p3nfs.what, me worry?
pgpBhg3kO6z21.pgp
Description: PGP signature
rsionDescription
+++-===-==-
ii gpg-idea 2 IDEA (PGP 2.x-compatible) module for GNU Pri
ii gpg-rsa 2 RSA (PGP 2.x-compatible) module for GNU Priv
Michael
--
Michael Meskes | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-4181
Hi
Ship's Log, Lt. Steve Haslam, Stardate 170599.1408:
>
> The gpg-pgp script and pgp2 compatibility hackage is in gpg-rsaidea, not
> gnupg (afaicr).
>From /var/lib/dpkg/diverts:
/usr/bin/gpg
/usr/bin/gpg.gnupg
gpg-rsa
/usr/man/man1/gpg.1.gz
/usr/man/man1/gpg.gnupg.1.gz
gpg-rsa
On Mon, May 17, 1999 at 11:27:39AM +0200, Alexander N. Benner wrote:
> Ship's Log, Lt. Michael Meskes, Stardate 140599.1439:
> > Which version do you use? I don't have that script.
>
>
> Was it removed in the l8est Version ?
> Cannot check the changelog as I still
Hi
Ship's Log, Lt. Michael Meskes, Stardate 140599.1439:
> Which version do you use? I don't have that script.
> ii gnupg 0.9.6-1GNU privacy guard - a free PGP replacement.
>
I have:
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-fi
Description
+++-===-==-
ii gnupg 0.9.6-1GNU privacy guard - a free PGP replacement.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz| Go Rhein Fire!
Tel.: (+49) 2431/72651 | Use Debian GNU/Linux!
Email: [E
On Fri, May 14, 1999 at 09:25:49AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > gpgm is not available anymore. I don't have an idea whether this is by
> > design.
>
> Oh? Hmm that I should look into, I've been using it :|
It is by desing. As of version 0.9.6.
--
Mike
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
