Marco d'Itri wrote:
> If the programs are linked statically then they will have the same
> memory footprint of programs linked with non-PIC libraries, so the
> situation will not be worse in this sense.
On non-i386 architectures, I will turn on --enable-dynamic to link to
the current PIC library.
On Feb 23, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> In this case the speed difference from using non-PIC code is
> noticeable. But the memory pressure from not sharing code between
> processes might mean it is not worth it --- I am really torn.
If the programs are linked statically then they will have the same
Thomas Weber wrote:
>>> Le mardi 23 février 2010 à 14:43 +0100, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
Using non-PIC code for a 5% speed up looks like an acceptable trade off
to me, but it really must be restricted only to architectures which
need it.
[...]
> You have x86 hardware that is so old th
3 matches
Mail list logo
