On 21 June 2013 15:05, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:52:40AM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> On 21 June 2013 11:24, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:34:54AM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> >> On 20 June 2013 18:26, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> >> > Dmitrij
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:52:40AM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> On 21 June 2013 11:24, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:34:54AM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> >> On 20 June 2013 18:26, Russ Allbery wrote:
> >> > Dmitrijs Ledkovs writes:
> >> >
> >> >> Thus in a bug repo
On 21 June 2013 11:24, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:34:54AM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> On 20 June 2013 18:26, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> > Dmitrijs Ledkovs writes:
>> >
>> >> Thus in a bug report 712763 [4], included below, I instead propose
>> >> instead shipping slight
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:34:54AM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> On 20 June 2013 18:26, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Dmitrijs Ledkovs writes:
> >
> >> Thus in a bug report 712763 [4], included below, I instead propose
> >> instead shipping slightly larger block of code in the upstart package
> >> w
On 20 June 2013 18:26, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Dmitrijs Ledkovs writes:
>
>> Thus in a bug report 712763 [4], included below, I instead propose
>> instead shipping slightly larger block of code in the upstart package
>> which is sourced by /lib/lsb/init-functions from init-functions.d
>> directory.
On 20 June 2013 16:32, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Dmitrijs Ledkovs
>
>> if init_is_upstart; then
>> upstart_job=/etc/init/$(basename ${0:-}).conf
>> if [ -f ${upstart_job:-} ] && [ ! -L ${upstart_job:-} ]; then
>
> Why the -L ?
>
! -L = not a symlink, upstart jobs cannot be symlinks. Ab
Dmitrijs Ledkovs writes:
> Thus in a bug report 712763 [4], included below, I instead propose
> instead shipping slightly larger block of code in the upstart package
> which is sourced by /lib/lsb/init-functions from init-functions.d
> directory. Something along the lines of:
> if init_is_upstar
]] Dmitrijs Ledkovs
> if init_is_upstart; then
> upstart_job=/etc/init/$(basename ${0:-}).conf
> if [ -f ${upstart_job:-} ] && [ ! -L ${upstart_job:-} ]; then
Why the -L ?
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Debian policy was updated some time ago [1] to include provisions for
supporting alternative init systems with a section specific to
supporting upstart init system. [2] In essence update-rc.d / incoke-rc.d
/ service commands must be used, as they properly understand and can act
upon init.d scripts
Debian policy was updated some time ago [1] to include provisions for
supporting alternative init systems with a section specific to
supporting upstart init system. [2] In essence update-rc.d / incoke-rc.d
/ service commands must be used, as they properly understand and can act
upon init.d scripts
10 matches
Mail list logo
