Re: On linux kernel packaging issue, assuming that user is never right

2003-11-09 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 06:59:39PM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote: > Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté : > > > On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 01:58:29PM +0100, Mateusz Papiernik wrote: > >> Andrew Suffield wrote: > >> >We're all very interested in *real* evidence here, because there > >> >hasn't bee

Re: On linux kernel packaging issue, assuming that user is never right

2003-11-09 Thread Martin Schulze
Mathieu Roy wrote: > Why do you always assume being facing idiots? I guess the answer would be experience... No, I'm only guessing, not knowing... > People knows all about placebo effect, but do you have any evidence > that there is nothing more than placebo effect? If you can't provide evidenc

Re: On linux kernel packaging issue, assuming that user is never right

2003-11-08 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sat, 08 Nov 2003, Mathieu Roy wrote: > People knows all about placebo effect, but do you have any evidence > that there is nothing more than placebo effect? It's normal for the person claiming that there are two populations to provide appropriate data and statistics to back up the claim.[1] By

Re: On linux kernel packaging issue, assuming that user is never right

2003-11-08 Thread Mathieu Roy
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté : > On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 01:58:29PM +0100, Mateusz Papiernik wrote: >> Andrew Suffield wrote: >> >We're all very interested in *real* evidence here, because there >> >hasn't been any in the past. If you don't have any evidence, you can >> >expect peo