Re: Old bug in ppmtofb is quite important

2009-03-08 Thread Ana Guerrero
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 03:45:01PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Jaap Boender [Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:47:01 +0100]: > > Hello, Jaap. > > > The explanation: since ppmtofb conflicts with any python version strictly > > higher than 2.4, any package that depends on python-2.4 will not be > > install

Re: Old bug in ppmtofb is quite important

2009-02-19 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Jaap Boender [Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:47:01 +0100]: Hello, Jaap. > The explanation: since ppmtofb conflicts with any python version strictly > higher than 2.4, any package that depends on python-2.4 will not be > installable together with ppmtofb, hence the 1591 packages (a full list, with > for

Re: Old bug in ppmtofb is quite important

2009-02-19 Thread Holger Levsen
severity 385209 serious thanks signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Old bug in ppmtofb is quite important

2009-02-19 Thread Jaap Boender
At the Mancoosi project (http://www.mancoosi.org), we've determined that this bug causes 1591 other packages not to be installable if ppmtofb is installed (and vice versa; ppmtofb is not installable if any of those 1591 packages are installed). The explanation: since ppmtofb conflicts with any