> using mkisofs (the one Andreas includes) it worked just fine on a PC with a
> QDI MB (it says something like Titanium IB+ TX... it's a 430TX chipset).
so the current mkisofs generates bootable cdroms ?
(i have to admin, i think i didn't change the mkisofs in 0.12, but i'm not
sure. maybe you can
> > i was told, that a bug with joilet+rr in 1.12* was fixed in 1.12a4,
> > but i would feel better with someone who has tested it.
>
> I used the mkisofs you included in the tarball... which one is it? It
> doesn't say...
it should be 1.12a4, the newest release. it's static compiled (so bo syste
On Thu, Jun 18, 1998 at 10:50:46PM +0200, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> >I used Andreas' tarball v 0.12 (which contains mkisofs) on a machine running
> >2.1.103, using -J -r (and -b, too), and it works fine... both 2.1.103 and
> >2.0.33 seem to prefer Joliet over RR, but I can see and use the symlin
>I used Andreas' tarball v 0.12 (which contains mkisofs) on a machine running
>2.1.103, using -J -r (and -b, too), and it works fine... both 2.1.103 and
>2.0.33 seem to prefer Joliet over RR, but I can see and use the symlinks on
>both systems... I pass no options to mount (fstab reads
>"defaults,r
> Great! So will the official hamm CD images be jolietized? :)
i didn't test the booting right now, but people told me it was fixed in 1.12a4.
unless new problems or bugs show up : yes.
andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
> "Andreas" == Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The stock kernel mounts this CD (mount -t auto /dev/hdd cdrom)
>> as joliet... it /spits:
>>
>> The writer is installed on a machine running 2.1.103 (the
>> support for my controller is better with 2.1.10x)
> The stock kernel mounts this CD (mount -t auto /dev/hdd cdrom) as joliet...
> it /spits:
>
> The writer is installed on a machine running 2.1.103 (the support for my
> controller is better with 2.1.10x), but I used the CD to freshly install
> Debian on a couple of PC's and to upgrade my own comp
On Thu, Jun 11, 1998 at 11:06:13PM +0200, Ronald Lembcke wrote:
> I had the same problem with my selfburned hamm cd's...
> the debian-hamm kernel seems to prefere joliet over
> rockridge with mount -o nojoliet the symlinks worked...
I used Andreas' tarball v 0.12 (which contains mkisofs)
On Thu, Jun 11, 1998 at 06:07:32PM +0200, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> sad news : after i created cdrom images with -J (joilet) option,
> the symlinks were broken : plain 2.0.33 sees them as files,
> but 2.0.34pre (with joilet patch) understands them.
Andreas, I don't know if this has been fixed,
> "Philip" == Philip Hands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the right place for this.
Philip>
Philip> Don't you mean:
Philip> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a separate mailing list just for CD
burning software under
> "Thomas" == Thomas Hohenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thomas> I followed the discussion above. I have two SuSE Linux
Thomas> 2.0.33/2.0.34 systems. The first system has my cdrecorder
Thomas> attached. I patched this one with the Joliet patch and a
Thomas> 2k blocksize p
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 12 10:34:48 1998
>>Ronald> another problem with joliet... a bug in mkisofs and
>>Ronald> mkhybrid (at least in the newest available versioin
>>Ronald> arround april 6th)
>>
>>Ronald> when you make a bootable cd with joliet _and_ rockridge
>>Ronal
Philip Hands wrote:
> > >I thought debian's 2.0.33 had the FAT32 patch. This is the same as the
> > >joilet
> > >stuff AFAIK. Does this mean that you are using a non-standard kernel or am
> > >I
> > >just totally wrong here?
> >
> > i don't know what [EMAIL PROTECTED] is useing (no symlinks at h
On 11 Jun 1998, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
[]
> So:
>
> * We need a way to make the kernel prefer iso9660 with rock-ridge over
>Joliet. The kernel currently prefers Joliet over iso9660 with
>rock-ridge, so symlinks are invisible on CD-ROMs that are both
>iso9660 and Joliet.
[]
I followe
>Ronald> another problem with joliet... a bug in mkisofs and
>Ronald> mkhybrid (at least in the newest available versioin
>Ronald> arround april 6th)
>
>Ronald> when you make a bootable cd with joliet _and_ rockridge
>Ronald> the information for the bios that it is a bootable cd
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the right place for this.
Don't you mean:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Cc:'ed to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> "Ronald" == Ronald Lembcke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ronald> I had the same problem with my selfburned hamm cd's... the
Ronald> debian-hamm kernel seems to prefere joliet over
Ronald> rockridge with mount -o nojoliet the symlinks
Ronald>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Instead of the two-cd's-without-source, I'd rather see a special
> lightweight _single_ Debian cd for i386 that carries:
> ...
> A cd like this, with approximately 250 meg binaries, 250 meg sources, 40
> meg documentation, 10 meg kernels and a 100 meg live filesystem would
> ma
> >I thought debian's 2.0.33 had the FAT32 patch. This is the same as the joilet
> >stuff AFAIK. Does this mean that you are using a non-standard kernel or am I
> >just totally wrong here?
>
> i don't know what [EMAIL PROTECTED] is useing (no symlinks at his machine),
> but my own system is runnin
>I thought debian's 2.0.33 had the FAT32 patch. This is the same as the joilet
>stuff AFAIK. Does this mean that you are using a non-standard kernel or am I
>just totally wrong here?
i don't know what [EMAIL PROTECTED] is useing (no symlinks at his machine),
but my own system is running 2.0.34pre1
> sad news : after i created cdrom images with -J (joilet) option,
> the symlinks were broken : plain 2.0.33 sees them as files,
> but 2.0.34pre (with joilet patch) understands them.
>
> i guess, i will have to create the official cdroms without joilet fs
> support.
>
> comments ?
I had the same
> With the 5 cd set they can choose. And smaller redistributors that simply
> burn gold cds (as I do in italy, just 20 to 40 cds) can choose to exclude
> a couple of them the from the distribution.
The Official CD images are meant for the big CD vendors, so we don't have them
doing a run of 1000
Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> sad news : after i created cdrom images with -J (joilet) option,
> the symlinks were broken : plain 2.0.33 sees them as files,
> but 2.0.34pre (with joilet patch) understands them.
>
> i guess, i will have to create the official cdroms without joilet fs
> support.
>
>
sad news : after i created cdrom images with -J (joilet) option,
the symlinks were broken : plain 2.0.33 sees them as files,
but 2.0.34pre (with joilet patch) understands them.
i guess, i will have to create the official cdroms without joilet fs
support.
comments ?
andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
On Wed, Jun 10, 1998 at 03:19:00PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Wed, 10 Jun 1998, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
>
> > a) 5 cd set : source, misc, and 3 binary cds.
> > misc + binary will be enought for every architecture, so
> > distributors can sell cd sets of 2 cds (or 3 with s
On Wed, 10 Jun 1998, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> a) 5 cd set : source, misc, and 3 binary cds.
> misc + binary will be enought for every architecture, so
> distributors can sell cd sets of 2 cds (or 3 with source).
> b) 4 cd set : highly integrated.
> it will not be possible
On Wed, Jun 10, 1998 at 01:53:56PM +0200, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> I can work in two directions :
>
> a) 5 cd set : source, misc, and 3 binary cds.
> misc + binary will be enought for every architecture, so
> distributors can sell cd sets of 2 cds (or 3 with source).
> b) 4 cd set
Hi!
> a) 5 cd set : source, misc, and 3 binary cds.
> misc + binary will be enought for every architecture, so
> distributors can sell cd sets of 2 cds (or 3 with source).
My vote for the 5 CD set.
Regards
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
I can work in two directions :
a) 5 cd set : source, misc, and 3 binary cds.
misc + binary will be enought for every architecture, so
distributors can sell cd sets of 2 cds (or 3 with source).
b) 4 cd set : highly integrated.
it will not be possible to split the m68k or a
29 matches
Mail list logo
