John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 09:51:32PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
>
> > Imagine for eample the case where the sources are missing files, as
> > happens too often. Then the binary is in violation of the GPL.
> >
> > Not good. So why not let the autobuild
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 09:51:32PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> Imagine for eample the case where the sources are missing files, as
> happens too often. Then the binary is in violation of the GPL.
>
> Not good. So why not let the autobuilder do their job for all archs.
Because then there's n
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 09:51:32PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > > > > The autobuilder will check the build-process of your package. It will
> > > > > build in a clean chroot with proper build-depends. With proper
> > > > > versions of all tools.
> > > > >
> > > > > If you upload binaries you
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 06:44:24AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > > > Don't upload binaries at all.
> > > >
> > > > The autobuilder will check the build-process of your package. It will
> > > > build in a clean chroot with proper build-depends. With p
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 06:44:24AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > > Don't upload binaries at all.
> > >
> > > The autobuilder will check the build-process of your package. It will
> > > build in a clean chroot with proper build-depends. With proper
> > > versions of all tools.
> > >
> > > If
Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > The autobuilder will check the build-process of your package.
>> YOU should do that.
> To err is human.
Yes. But that does not transform to "Dont do it, i could make an error."
>> There are enough ways to test your Build-Depends.
>> And if you ha
Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > There are several reasons not to do this.
> > Don't upload binaries at all.
>
> Why?
>
> > The autobuilder will check the build-process of your package.
>
> YOU should do that.
To err is human.
> >
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 12:17:01AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > Don't upload binaries at all.
> >
> > The autobuilder will check the build-process of your package. It will
> > build in a clean chroot with proper build-depends. With proper
> > versio
Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There are several reasons not to do this.
> Don't upload binaries at all.
Why?
> The autobuilder will check the build-process of your package.
YOU should do that.
> It will build in a clean chroot with proper build-depends.
> With proper versions
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 12:17:01AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> Don't upload binaries at all.
>
> The autobuilder will check the build-process of your package. It will
> build in a clean chroot with proper build-depends. With proper
> versions of all tools.
>
> If you upload binaries you get
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 03:09:52PM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> Is there any reason not to do this? It seems that it might speed up the
I do that frequently and it seems to work well. I use Alpha, PowerPC, and
i386 regularly and all three are machines I use to build on for Debian.
Sometimes I n
Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Since I have access to both Intel and Sparc hardware, it would be possible
> for me to upload both the i386 version and the Sparc version of the binary
> packages when I build a new release.
>
> Is there any reason not to do this? It seems that it might
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 03:09:52PM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> Is there any reason not to do this? It seems that it might speed up the
Save you time, and if you aren't actually following the current status of
the extra archs you build for, you might end up uploading it during an
arch-specific tra
On Sat, 31 Aug 2002, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> Is there any reason not to do this? It seems that it might speed up the
> autobuild process, specially when it is a library like libgmp3 which other
> packages depend upon for their builds...
Not really. Once you upload the pkg, and in the next 15 minut
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 03:09:52PM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> Since I have access to both Intel and Sparc hardware, it would be possible
> for me to upload both the i386 version and the Sparc version of the binary
> packages when I build a new release.
Several people do this. It's not exactly co
Since I have access to both Intel and Sparc hardware, it would be possible
for me to upload both the i386 version and the Sparc version of the binary
packages when I build a new release.
Is there any reason not to do this? It seems that it might speed up the
autobuild process, specially when it is
16 matches
Mail list logo
