Re: New release of ifupdown planned

2003-09-01 Thread Marc Haber
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 14:14:13 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: >On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 09:36:31PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote: >> Since the maintainer of ifupdown doesn't answer repeated attempts >> to contact him by e-mail, I suppose it is appropriate to report >> here that there is a group of people wor

Re: New release of ifupdown planned

2003-08-28 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Thomas Hood ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > The ifupdown package hasn't been touched by its maintainer for over > two years and it is about time some of its problems were addressed. > > Since the maintainer of ifupdown doesn't answer repeated attempts > to contact him by e-mail, I suppose it is app

Re: New release of ifupdown planned

2003-08-28 Thread Branden Robinson
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 02:14:13PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 09:36:31PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote: > > Since the maintainer of ifupdown doesn't answer repeated attempts > > to contact him by e-mail, I suppose it is appropriate to report > > here that there is a group of p

Re: New release of ifupdown planned

2003-08-28 Thread Anthony Towns
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 09:50:12PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 02:14:13PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > The term is "an ifupdown NMU". > For crying out loud, it's been NMUed four times in a row already.. Yes, all of which were checked over by me first, and done with appro

Re: New release of ifupdown planned

2003-08-28 Thread Joshua Kwan
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 02:14:13PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > The term is "an ifupdown NMU". For crying out loud, it's been NMUed four times in a row already.. > You certainly should not be considering hijacking it. Why not? Do you have a new maintainer release which acknowledges NMUs, incorp

Re: New release of ifupdown planned

2003-08-27 Thread Anthony Towns
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 09:36:31PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote: > Since the maintainer of ifupdown doesn't answer repeated attempts > to contact him by e-mail, I suppose it is appropriate to report > here that there is a group of people working on a new ifupdown > release. The term is "an ifupdown

Re: New release of ifupdown planned

2003-08-27 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 09:36:31PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote: > The ifupdown package hasn't been touched by its maintainer for over > two years and it is about time some of its problems were addressed. Thanks for taking the initiative on this. I'd noticed it's neglect a while back but didn't have

New release of ifupdown planned

2003-08-27 Thread Thomas Hood
The ifupdown package hasn't been touched by its maintainer for over two years and it is about time some of its problems were addressed. Since the maintainer of ifupdown doesn't answer repeated attempts to contact him by e-mail, I suppose it is appropriate to report here that there is a group of pe