Re: New glibc with NPTL in experimental

2003-10-04 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 09:49:17AM +1000, Brian May wrote: > On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 11:21:21PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > I've just placed a new glibc package for experimental in incoming. > > libc6-i686 is new, so it may be a few days before it shows up in the > > archive. These packag

Re: New glibc with NPTL in experimental

2003-10-04 Thread Joel Baker
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 09:49:17AM +1000, Brian May wrote: > On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 11:21:21PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > I've just placed a new glibc package for experimental in incoming. > > libc6-i686 is new, so it may be a few days before it shows up in the > > archive. These packag

Re: New glibc with NPTL in experimental

2003-10-04 Thread Brian May
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 11:21:21PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > I've just placed a new glibc package for experimental in incoming. > libc6-i686 is new, so it may be a few days before it shows up in the > archive. These packages should be considered _extremely experimental_, as > neither the

New glibc with NPTL in experimental

2003-10-03 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
I've just placed a new glibc package for experimental in incoming. libc6-i686 is new, so it may be a few days before it shows up in the archive. These packages should be considered _extremely experimental_, as neither the NPTL libraries (requires 2.6.0; I don't think it will behave right if you h