On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:19:33PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2016, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > * Jonathan Dowland [2016-06-24 09:24 +0100]:
> > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:10:50PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I've packaged neomutt for Debian. A Debian IT
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * Jonathan Dowland [2016-06-24 09:24 +0100]:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:10:50PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > > I am pleased to announce the availability of neomutt [0] packages for
> > > Debian. Hints for installation you'll find at
* Jonathan Dowland [2016-06-24 09:24 +0100]:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:10:50PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > I am pleased to announce the availability of neomutt [0] packages for
> > Debian. Hints for installation you'll find at [1].
> snip
> >
> > I've packaged neomutt for Debian. A D
hi
On 06/24/2016 05:32 PM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:59:00PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>> * Holger Levsen , 2016-06-24, 09:05:
I am suggesting that I remember what happened with mutt-kz.
>>> I have no idea what you are referring to here, but it reminds me to say
>>> tha
* Adam Borowski , 2016-06-24, 17:32:
I have no idea what you are referring to here, but it reminds me to
say that I think the name "mutt-kz" is a NO-GO. I know it's from the
authors initials, but… to me it sounds like "mutt-hitler" or probably
worse.
Send complaints to Karel's parents...
Eve
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:59:00PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Holger Levsen , 2016-06-24, 09:05:
> >>I am suggesting that I remember what happened with mutt-kz.
> >I have no idea what you are referring to here, but it reminds me to say
> >that I think the name "mutt-kz" is a NO-GO. I know it's fr
* Holger Levsen , 2016-06-24, 09:05:
I am suggesting that I remember what happened with mutt-kz.
I have no idea what you are referring to here, but it reminds me to say
that I think the name "mutt-kz" is a NO-GO. I know it's from the
authors initials, but… to me it sounds like "mutt-hitler" or
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 07:33:40AM -0300, Tiago Ilieve wrote:
> His package is in the archive for over two years[3] and
> looks like no one felt offended enough to fill a bug before.
I only noticed mutt-kz three months ago…
And I'd also be fine with a rename to mutt-karel or mutt-karel-zak.
-
Holger,
On 24 June 2016 at 06:05, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I have no idea what you are referring to here, but it reminds me to say
> that I think the name "mutt-kz" is a NO-GO. I know it's from the authors
> initials, but… to me it sounds like "mutt-hitler" or probably worse.
Wait... What? So are
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 09:05:16AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> And I don't think this is a german thing (well…) - the term "KZ" is
> known by millions of non german speaking people, cause their loved ones
> suffered and died there.
s#non german speaking people#non german speaking and german spea
Hi Victor,
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:30:16AM +0200, Víctor M. Jáquez L. wrote:
> I'm sorry, I didn't know. Thanks.
> The name comes from the main author of the project: Karel Zak.
[...]
> Independently of the badly chosen name, I accepted to deprecate mutt-kz in
> favor or neomutt.
wow, very coo
On 06/24/16 at 09:05am, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 08:44:18AM +, Clint Adams wrote:
> > I am suggesting that I remember what happened with mutt-kz.
>
> I have no idea what you are referring to here, but it reminds me to say
> that I think the name "mutt-kz" is a NO-GO. I kn
Ian Jackson writes:
> I don't think there is anything wrong with having a competing package.
There is. I'm fairly sure the security team will not be happy...
Packaging the *same* project twice seems even more useless busy work for
them than packaging lots of forks of the same project (which some p
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 08:44:18AM +, Clint Adams wrote:
> I am suggesting that I remember what happened with mutt-kz.
I have no idea what you are referring to here, but it reminds me to say
that I think the name "mutt-kz" is a NO-GO. I know it's from the authors
initials, but… to me it sounds
* Clint Adams , 2016-06-24, 08:44:
I am suggesting that I remember what happened with mutt-kz.
What happened with mutt-kz?
--
Jakub Wilk
Clint Adams writes ("Re: Neomutt packages available"):
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 09:41:38AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > You seem to be either suggesting that the mutt people should be prevented
> > from
> > their pre-existing plan to move to neomutt
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 09:41:38AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> You seem to be either suggesting that the mutt people should be prevented from
> their pre-existing plan to move to neomutt, or we should have two neomutt
> packages in Debian at the same time.
I am suggesting that I remember what
Clint Adams writes ("Re: Neomutt packages available"):
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 09:24:27AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > Rather than work with the existing team Elimar has persisted with
> > efforts to package neomutt separately and has even suggested a *differe
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 08:30:22AM +, Clint Adams wrote:
> Territorial bullshit.
You seem to be either suggesting that the mutt people should be prevented from
their pre-existing plan to move to neomutt, or we should have two neomutt
packages in Debian at the same time.
--
Jonathan Dowland
P
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 09:24:27AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> Rather than work with the existing team Elimar has persisted with
> efforts to package neomutt separately and has even suggested a *different*
> team is set up to maintain neomutt, versus pkg-mutt.
Good.
> A fork by any other nam
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:10:50PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> I am pleased to announce the availability of neomutt [0] packages for
> Debian. Hints for installation you'll find at [1].
snip
>
> I've packaged neomutt for Debian. A Debian ITP [2] is filed.
> [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b
Hi all,
I am pleased to announce the availability of neomutt [0] packages for
Debian. Hints for installation you'll find at [1].
I've packaged neomutt for Debian. A Debian ITP [2] is filed. The
binaries are build in a sid environment. The sources are fetched
from [3]. The neomutt branch is used.
22 matches
Mail list logo
