Bart Schuller wrote:
> download.sourceforge.net
Funny:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% host ftp.debian.org
ftp.debian.org A 64.28.67.101
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% host download.sourceforge.net
download.sourceforge.netA 64.28.67.101
Roland
--
Roland Bauerschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 01:02:25PM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > That's everyone's hoping :) It was down for a few days in the last month,
> > even. :(
>
> Didn't know that. There hasn't been any discussion I've seen. So I wasn't
> sure whether it was a local problem. Anyway, is sourceforge not
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 06:40:06PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> If you want to see a list of the update timestamps of all known mirrors
> look at http://attila.bofh.it/~md/ .
Thanks. That helps a lot.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael@Fam-Meskes.De
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
Use Debian GNU/Linu
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 04:32:49PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> But you haven't bothered to try five percent of those. Why do you expect
> others will bother to reply to your mail? :>
Na, I did check 20% (make that 30 today) of the primary sites. :-)
> That's everyone's hoping :) It was down for a
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 03:17:49PM +0100, Bart Schuller wrote:
> > (the three machines outside the US I tried so far are not) and b) is
> > accessible pretty well (which ftp.debian.org is not).
>
> download.sourceforge.net
which of course is ftp.debian.org. :-)
> Does rsync too :-)
With which s
On Jan 04, Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>ftp.debian.org has been very flaky for me for weeks. And neither
>ftp.de.debian.org nor source.rfc822.org are up-to-date. I guess they have
>the very same problem accessing ftp.debian.org during their mirror process.
{ftp,http}.it.debian.org
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 11:01:43AM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
Hi!
> Is there any apt-able server out there that is accessible with a better
> bandwidth than ftp.debian.org (currently 468 bytes/sec) but still is
> up-to-date?
ftp.freenet.de seems to be very actually and it's fast too. Give it a
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 02:56:41PM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > There are almost two hundred public Debian mirrors, use them.
>
> Sure. But I was hoping someone would know a machine that a) is up-to-date
> (the three machines outside the US I tried so far are not) and b) is
> accessible pretty
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 02:56:41PM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 01:48:34PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > There are almost two hundred public Debian mirrors, use them.
>
> Sure. But I was hoping someone would know a machine that a) is up-to-date
> (the three machines outsi
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 01:48:34PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> There are almost two hundred public Debian mirrors, use them.
Sure. But I was hoping someone would know a machine that a) is up-to-date
(the three machines outside the US I tried so far are not) and b) is
accessible pretty well (which
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 11:01:43AM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Is there any apt-able server out there that is accessible with a better
> bandwidth than ftp.debian.org (currently 468 bytes/sec) but still is
> up-to-date?
There are almost two hundred public Debian mirrors, use them.
http
Is there any apt-able server out there that is accessible with a better
bandwidth than ftp.debian.org (currently 468 bytes/sec) but still is
up-to-date?
ftp.debian.org has been very flaky for me for weeks. And neither
ftp.de.debian.org nor source.rfc822.org are up-to-date. I guess they have
the ve
12 matches
Mail list logo
