* Steffen Moeller:
> I do not like "project" in the package name too much. If you think of
> how "www.r-project.org" is presented in Debian (as r-..) then it would sound
> strange to me to add "project" to a project that does not have "project" in
> its name.
It's less confusing than "root-sys
On Friday 08 December 2006 17:29, Florian Weimer wrote:
> "root-project" instead of "root" could solve the problem. It's not
> just that the name is too generic, your users might assume that
> root-tail and root-portal are part of your packages.
>
> But you really need to get ftpmaster feedback.
hi Florian,
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 17:29 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Christian Holm Christensen:
>
> > Shared libraries: libroot5.13 for the core libs
> > libroot-*5.13 for add-on libs
> > Libdevel pkgs:libroot-dev for the core libs
> > libroot-
* Christian Holm Christensen:
> Shared libraries: libroot5.13 for the core libs
> libroot-*5.13 for add-on libs
> Libdevel pkgs:libroot-dev for the core libs
> libroot-*-dev for add-on libs
These shouldn't be a problem, I think.
> Plugins:
Dear Debian Developers,
I have filled an ITP [1] on packaging the ROOT [2] software, a suite of
C++ classes, utilities, etc. designed for making large scale data
analysis software in the Physical Sciences. It's considered to be part
[3] of the DebianScience [4] `sub-project'.
The packages are
5 matches
Mail list logo
