On 29/04/08 at 11:54 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> FWIW, I think NMUing a package shouldn't end up with a sourceful upload
> but should instead have a .diff.gz, whether it's a native package or not.
When NMUing a native package, which problem would it add to upload a
source package with a single .ta
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:17:12PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > I'd be very unhappy about that. For one, I think using such suffix in a
> > field that forms part of users' everyday's life is, uhm, inappropriate
> > or disruptive. What do they care if the version is a NMU or not?
> Hu? And +dfs
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:17:12PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > > I want a consistent versioning scheme, thus +nmuX for both native and
> > > non-natives packages.
> >
> > I'd be very unhappy about that. For one, I think using such suffix in a
> >
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > I want a consistent versioning scheme, thus +nmuX for both native and
> > non-natives packages.
>
> I'd be very unhappy about that. For one, I think using such suffix in a
> field that forms part of users' everyday's life is, uhm, inappropriate
> or d
* Raphael Hertzog [Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:16:34 +0200]:
> (reply-to set to debian-devel only)
> On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, James Vega wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 09:42:59PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > > This DEP is available on the Debian Wiki[1].
> > "The version must be the version of the last
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 01:01:53PM +0200, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * Bastian Blank [Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:55:23 +0200]:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:16:28PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > > * Mike Hommey [Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:54:59 +0200]:
> > > > FWIW, I think NMUing a packag
* Bastian Blank [Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:55:23 +0200]:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:16:28PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > * Mike Hommey [Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:54:59 +0200]:
> > > FWIW, I think NMUing a package shouldn't end up with a sourceful upload
> > > but should instead have a .diff.gz, whether i
Kartik Mistry wrote:
> someversion+nmu1, someversion+nmu2 for example see, bzflag package. It
> is at 2.0.10.20071115+nmu1 right now.
Thanks, that answers my question.
--
·''`. Come, let me sing into your ear, those dancing days are gone
: :' : I carry the sun in a golden cup, the moon
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:16:28PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Mike Hommey [Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:54:59 +0200]:
> > FWIW, I think NMUing a package shouldn't end up with a sourceful upload
> > but should instead have a .diff.gz, whether it's a native package or not.
> 100% agreed. (Assuming you me
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:16:28PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > FWIW, I think NMUing a package shouldn't end up with a sourceful upload
> > but should instead have a .diff.gz, whether it's a native package or not.
>
> 100% agreed. (Assuming you mean a NMU should never, ever, create a new
> tarb
* Mike Hommey [Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:54:59 +0200]:
> FWIW, I think NMUing a package shouldn't end up with a sourceful upload
> but should instead have a .diff.gz, whether it's a native package or not.
100% agreed. (Assuming you mean a NMU should never, ever, create a new
tarball, particularly apply
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:32:34AM +0200, Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Vega wrote:
> > "The version must be the version of the last upload, plus +nmuX, where
> > X is a counter starting at 1."
>
> I have found that NMUing native source packages is a bit tricky, as in,
> what is the con
On Tuesday 29 Apr 2008 3:02:34 pm Amaya wrote:
> > "The version must be the version of the last upload, plus +nmuX, where
> > X is a counter starting at 1."
>
> I have found that NMUing native source packages is a bit tricky, as in,
> what is the consensuous regarding this increment? Where to incre
James Vega wrote:
> "The version must be the version of the last upload, plus +nmuX, where
> X is a counter starting at 1."
I have found that NMUing native source packages is a bit tricky, as in,
what is the consensuous regarding this increment? Where to increment?
I hope I made myself understood
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I want a consistent versioning scheme, thus +nmuX for both native and
> non-natives packages.
>
> Consider this a wishlist bug against devscripts. :-)
And the Developer's Reference.
I do recommend actually filing said wishlist bugs, of course. :)
Raphael Hertzog wrote, Friday, April 25, 2008 3:16 PM
On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, James Vega wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 09:42:59PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> This DEP is available on the Debian Wiki[1].
"The version must be the version of the last upload, plus +nmuX, where X
is a
counter startin
(reply-to set to debian-devel only)
On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, James Vega wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 09:42:59PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > This DEP is available on the Debian Wiki[1].
>
> "The version must be the version of the last upload, plus +nmuX, where X is a
> counter starting at 1."
>
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 09:42:59PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> This DEP is available on the Debian Wiki[1].
"The version must be the version of the last upload, plus +nmuX, where X is a
counter starting at 1."
The above was added to the DEP to "match dch" but dch only uses that format
for native N
18 matches
Mail list logo
