Re: NM application

2002-11-24 Thread Graham Wilson
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 12:07:22AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > Carlos Laviola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > -newmaint-discuss is probably better. > > Dead list according to lists.debian.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not though, and there has been some discussion there in the past. -- gram pgpW8

Re: NM application

2002-11-24 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Carlos Laviola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > -newmaint-discuss is probably better. Dead list according to lists.debian.org -- bye Joerg A.D. 1492: Christopher Columbus arrives in what he believes to be India, but which RMS informs him is actually GNU/India.

Re: NM application

2002-11-24 Thread Carlos Laviola
newmaint-discuss is probably better. > Anyway, I'm trying to find out why my NM application ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > is taking so long to get through the final part of the process. My AM > approved my application on 25 May 2002. It's now 24 Nov 2002 - so that's > pret

NM application

2002-11-23 Thread Geoff O'Callaghan
G'day, Sorry to raise this at the moment as i'm sure everyone is busy recovering from recent events and even though this is probably not the appropriate forum all my other efforts have fallen on deaf emails. Anyway, I'm trying to find out why my NM application ([EMAIL PROTECT