Re: NEW queue backlog

2006-05-25 Thread Michael Banck
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 08:46:17AM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > Are you sure that this isn't done? I had the impression that fixes for > RC bugs that only are soname changes or something were processed a > couple of days ago... Indeed, Jörg found time immediately after Debconf and before traval

Re: NEW queue backlog

2006-05-24 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Michael Banck wrote: > On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:39:36AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: >> Debconf is over now, so I fully expect the NEW queue to be handled again >> as good as it used to be in a few weeks. Which would hopefully mean that >> emile, a package that I uploaded and which is stuck in N

NEW queue backlog (was: Re: Sun Java available from non-free)

2006-05-24 Thread Michael Banck
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:39:36AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Debconf is over now, so I fully expect the NEW queue to be handled again > as good as it used to be in a few weeks. Which would hopefully mean that > emile, a package that I uploaded and which is stuck in NEW as well, will > be acce

Re: NEW queue backlog

2006-05-23 Thread Thomas Viehmann
[apologies for the blank reply] Michael Banck wrote: > Both Jörg and Jeroen (who are usually doing the NEW processing AFAIK) > are travelling in Mexico for another two weeks I believe. Maybe one of > the regular ftp-masters steps in and does some processing for the more > important stuff in the m