wxWidgets 2.5 [Was Re: NEW-queue handling after extending group of ftp-master]

2005-03-23 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 08:43:17PM -0500, Josh Metzler wrote: > > Believe me I'm trying to investigate and fix #295131. Btw any ideas/help > > are welcome. Second RC bug for scorched3d is fixed both in upstream and > > on my box, but without fixing first one there's no need to upload. > > Once aga

Re: NEW-queue handling after extending group of ftp-master

2005-03-23 Thread Josh Metzler
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 05:33 pm, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 11:09:17PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > > Usually NEW-queue was handled by the date of first upload of some > > > package. After tracking of debian-bugs and/or debian-wnpp mailing > > > lists last days

Re: NEW-queue handling after extending group of ftp-master

2005-03-23 Thread Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 11:09:17PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > Usually NEW-queue was handled by the date of first upload of some package. > > After tracking of debian-bugs and/or debian-wnpp mailing lists last days > > I can say it's not true anymore. > > > So could someone explain what are th

Re: NEW-queue handling after extending group of ftp-master

2005-03-23 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 10237 March 1977, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: > Usually NEW-queue was handled by the date of first upload of some package. > After tracking of debian-bugs and/or debian-wnpp mailing lists last days > I can say it's not true anymore. > So could someone explain what are the criterions now?

NEW-queue handling after extending group of ftp-master

2005-03-23 Thread Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo
Hello. Usually NEW-queue was handled by the date of first upload of some package. After tracking of debian-bugs and/or debian-wnpp mailing lists last days I can say it's not true anymore. So could someone explain what are the criterions now? regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[E