W> The usual package name is -doc. Just to be sure,
W> you may want to check the changelogs of the packages with missing docs,
W> however.
$ w3m -dump http://packages.debian.org/unstable/doc/|fgrep '[non-free]'
finds some. I suppose some aren't ready yet, like tar. At least it
still has man pages,
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 10:20:17AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Hi. I'm just a lowly user with a bandwidth problem.
> Certainly was a shock to get back from town to find the documentation
> gone from the debs I brought back.
> However, I am to make one last trip to town so it's my one shot chance
>
Hi. I'm just a lowly user with a bandwidth problem.
Certainly was a shock to get back from town to find the documentation
gone from the debs I brought back.
However, I am to make one last trip to town so it's my one shot chance
to download the new additional debs where that documentation now lies.
Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 10604 March 1977, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>
>> The simplest way I can see is to take the pristine tarball and rename
>> to foo-non-free of foo-non-dfsg, and to just install what was removed
>> from the modified tarball in main. However, the Emacs tarball
On 10604 March 1977, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> The simplest way I can see is to take the pristine tarball and rename
> to foo-non-free of foo-non-dfsg, and to just install what was removed
> from the modified tarball in main. However, the Emacs tarball is
> 18 megs big so I'm not sure ftp masters wou
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> I was told unequivocally that just shipping the whole tarball
> for make, which is 1.5MB large, would not be acceptable. I ended up
I was suspecting this.
> having to create two new .orig.tar.gz files, with minimal overlap in
> contents
On 24 Mar 2006, Jérôme Marant told this:
> Hi,
>
> The Emacs documentation is going to be moved to non-free since
> it is GFDLed with invariant sections.
>
> I'd like know how packagers who have the same problem usually
> handle this, especially the non-free package.
>
> The simplest way I can see
Hi,
The Emacs documentation is going to be moved to non-free since
it is GFDLed with invariant sections.
I'd like know how packagers who have the same problem usually
handle this, especially the non-free package.
The simplest way I can see is to take the pristine tarball and rename
to foo-non-fr
8 matches
Mail list logo
