Re: More about GFDL

2005-05-31 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote: > El Viernes 22 Abril 2005 14:37, Maciej Dems escribió: >> I have a simple question concerning the GFDL discussion. >> >> Does the GFDL documentation which currently does not contain any >> invariant section have to go to non-free as well? Yes, until the GFDL is revi

Re: More about GFDL

2005-04-24 Thread Cesar Martinez Izquierdo
El Domingo 24 Abril 2005 04:39, Adeodato Simó escribió: > * Cesar Martinez Izquierdo [Sun, 24 Apr 2005 04:15:28 +0300]: > > El Viernes 22 Abril 2005 14:57, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh escribió: > > > On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Maciej Dems wrote: > > > > I have a simple question concerning the GFDL discus

Re: More about GFDL

2005-04-24 Thread Cesar Martinez Izquierdo
El Domingo 24 Abril 2005 04:36, Glenn Maynard escribió: > On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 04:15:28AM +0300, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote: > > El Viernes 22 Abril 2005 14:57, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh escribió: > > > On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Maciej Dems wrote: > > > > I have a simple question concerning the

Re: More about GFDL

2005-04-23 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 04:15:28AM +0300, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote: > El Viernes 22 Abril 2005 14:57, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh escribió: > > On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Maciej Dems wrote: > > > I have a simple question concerning the GFDL discussion. > > > > For which the simple answer is: > > Re

Re: More about GFDL

2005-04-23 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Cesar Martinez Izquierdo [Sun, 24 Apr 2005 04:15:28 +0300]: > El Viernes 22 Abril 2005 14:57, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh escribió: > > On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Maciej Dems wrote: > > > I have a simple question concerning the GFDL discussion. > > For which the simple answer is: > > Read http://peopl

Re: More about GFDL

2005-04-23 Thread Cesar Martinez Izquierdo
El Viernes 22 Abril 2005 14:57, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh escribió: > On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Maciej Dems wrote: > > I have a simple question concerning the GFDL discussion. > > For which the simple answer is: > Read http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.xhtml I have the same questi

Re: More about GFDL

2005-04-23 Thread Brian May
> "Maciej" == Maciej Dems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Maciej> I have a simple question concerning the GFDL discussion. Maciej> Does the GFDL documentation which currently does not Maciej> contain any invariant section have to go to non-free as Maciej> well? It might be better

Re: More about GFDL

2005-04-22 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Maciej Dems wrote: > I have a simple question concerning the GFDL discussion. For which the simple answer is: Read http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.xhtml -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the dark

More about GFDL

2005-04-22 Thread Maciej Dems
I have a simple question concerning the GFDL discussion. Does the GFDL documentation which currently does not contain any invariant section have to go to non-free as well? As I understand the problem, such documentation is free and only can loose its freeness in the future. But the same can be