(We're now in ‘debian-legal’ territory; please follow up there.)
Dominik Smatana writes:
> One more "license-newbie" question:
>
> In some upstream source files there is just one single line comment at
> beginning:
>
> // Please see included LICENSE.TXT
>
> licensecheck says "UNKNOWN" of cour
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 09:51:25AM +0100, Dominik Smatana wrote:
> Hello,
>
> thank you for answers.. I'll contact upstream author.
>
> One more "license-newbie" question:
>
> In some upstream source files there is just one single line comment at
> beginning:
>
> // Please see included LICENSE.
Hello,
thank you for answers.. I'll contact upstream author.
One more "license-newbie" question:
In some upstream source files there is just one single line comment at
beginning:
// Please see included LICENSE.TXT
licensecheck says "UNKNOWN" of course...
Is such reference to external file suf
On 11693 March 1977, Dominik Smatana wrote:
> Or should I edit these files and add missing licenses (copy & paste
> from "main" file)?
Talk to upstream. Unless you have written the files it is *NOT* yours to
declare them being licensed in whatever way.
--
bye, Joerg
hmm, I should fill in the b
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 14:20 +0100, Dominik Smatana wrote:
> Hello,
>
> there are missing licenses in some source files in upstream project
> I'm packaging for Debian.
>
> There is just license in the "main" source file.
>
> Is it fine?
>
> Or should I edit these files and add missing licenses (
Hello,
there are missing licenses in some source files in upstream project
I'm packaging for Debian.
There is just license in the "main" source file.
Is it fine?
Or should I edit these files and add missing licenses (copy & paste
from "main" file)?
Thanks for advice.
Dominik Smatana
--
To
6 matches
Mail list logo
