* Niels Thykier [241108 14:12]:
> Jakub Ružička:
> > I've fixed #1081191 through changelog entry in knot/3.4.0-3 and it's
> > marked as Done but the bug still blocks knot migration for reasons I
> > don't understand:
> > https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=knot
>
> The problem is that the B
Jakub Ružička:
Hello,
I've fixed #1081191 through changelog entry in knot/3.4.0-3 and it's
marked as Done but the bug still blocks knot migration for reasons I
don't understand:
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=knot
What do I need to do to finally finish migration?
Cheers,
Jakub Ruž
Hello,
I've fixed #1081191 through changelog entry in knot/3.4.0-3 and it's
marked as Done but the bug still blocks knot migration for reasons I
don't understand:
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=knot
What do I need to do to finally finish migration?
Cheers,
Jakub Ružička
signature.
On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 at 11:02:29 +0200, Joachim Zobel wrote:
> I have tried all available --boot options for autopkgtest with s390x
> and was not able to create an image
I suspect you mean autopkgtest-{build,virt}-qemu. autopkgtest itself (the
test runner) does not have a --boot option.
The ci.deb
Am Freitag, dem 25.10.2024 um 08:08 +0200 schrieb Paul Gevers:
> > 2. I am unable to reproduce the failing test since there is no working
> > --boot option for autopkgtest and and I can't find any info on how to
> > run qemu for that architecture.
>
>
> I don't understand the remark in the first
Hi Joachim,
On 25-10-2024 07:22, Joachim Zobel wrote:
The migration of our package mosquitto is blocked by failing
autopkgtests of the depending package node-mqtt on s390x (See [1]). I
have reported this as a bug for the failing depending package [2].
Thanks for reporting. To be fair, the s39
Hi.
The migration of our package mosquitto is blocked by failing
autopkgtests of the depending package node-mqtt on s390x (See [1]). I
have reported this as a bug for the failing depending package [2].
We are facing two issues with this:
1. We would like to move to testing soon as the release fix
On 12/6/23 23:02, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi,
On 05-12-2023 03:52, Yadd wrote:
I uploaded src:node-proxy-agents into unstable, which is the new source
of node-proxy and node-https-proxy-agent. This package didn't migrate
but I don't understand the reason of this block.
The tracker[1] reports reg
Hi,
On 05-12-2023 03:52, Yadd wrote:
I uploaded src:node-proxy-agents into unstable, which is the new source
of node-proxy and node-https-proxy-agent. This package didn't migrate
but I don't understand the reason of this block.
The tracker[1] reports regressions on node-proxy and
node-https-
On 12/5/23 06:52, Yadd wrote:
Hi all,
I uploaded src:node-proxy-agents into unstable, which is the new source
of node-proxy and node-https-proxy-agent. This package didn't migrate
but I don't understand the reason of this block.
The tracker[1] reports regressions on node-proxy and
node-http
Hi all,
I uploaded src:node-proxy-agents into unstable, which is the new source
of node-proxy and node-https-proxy-agent. This package didn't migrate
but I don't understand the reason of this block.
The tracker[1] reports regressions on node-proxy and
node-https-proxy-agent (which are replac
11 matches
Mail list logo