Goswin von Brederlow (17/03/2009):
> Aurelien Jarno writes:
> > I am interested in seeing the dpkg patch.
>
> The most current work should be on the multiarch alioth project. If
> you do work on something please add it there.
>
> http://alioth.debian.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=310911
Aurelien Jarno writes:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 07:48:18PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Aurelien Jarno writes:
>>
>> > Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
>> >> And by the way. We had basic multiarch support before sarge. This is
>> >> not "before". This is after it has already killed mul
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 07:48:18PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno writes:
>
> > Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
> >> And by the way. We had basic multiarch support before sarge. This is
> >> not "before". This is after it has already killed multiarch for 2
> >> stable release
Aurelien Jarno writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
>> And by the way. We had basic multiarch support before sarge. This is
>> not "before". This is after it has already killed multiarch for 2
>> stable releases. If we don't get things moving in parallel it will
>> never be ready for squeeze
Aurelien Jarno writes:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 03:40:53PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Aurelien Jarno writes:
>>
>> > If you want to get some more multiarch ennemies, this is clearly the way
>> > to go.
>> >
>> > The alternate method is to post a list to debian-devel, and when we have
>> > a
Hi
Dne Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:34:28 +0100
Goswin von Brederlow napsal(a):
> So we should just ignore blatant policy violation until the moment they
> do bite us in the ass? So we wait until the verry last moment when
> everything would be ready to use multiarch and then we freeze squeeze
> before p
Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
> Aurelien Jarno writes:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:11:35PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> over the weekend I did some work on multiarch again and did notice
>>> some new and old problems when adding more libraries to my test set.
>>>
>>> Gi
Aurelien Jarno writes:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:11:35PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> over the weekend I did some work on multiarch again and did notice
>> some new and old problems when adding more libraries to my test set.
>>
>> Given that the problems are quite easily d
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 03:40:53PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno writes:
>
> > If you want to get some more multiarch ennemies, this is clearly the way
> > to go.
> >
> > The alternate method is to post a list to debian-devel, and when we have
> > a basic multiarch support, you may
Aurelien Jarno writes:
> If you want to get some more multiarch ennemies, this is clearly the way
> to go.
>
> The alternate method is to post a list to debian-devel, and when we have
> a basic multiarch support, you may start thinking about filling bugs.
> Not before.
Well, regardless of the be
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:11:35PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> over the weekend I did some work on multiarch again and did notice
> some new and old problems when adding more libraries to my test set.
>
> Given that the problems are quite easily detectable I'm considering
> scann
Josselin Mouette writes:
> Le lundi 16 mars 2009 à 12:11 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
>> Example: libgtk2.0-0 contains /etc/gtk-2.0/im-multipress.conf
>>
>> For this I want to file bugs (on top of violations of the MUST
>> directive) requesting that either the conffile is split into a
>
Le lundi 16 mars 2009 à 12:11 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
> Example: libgtk2.0-0 contains /etc/gtk-2.0/im-multipress.conf
>
> For this I want to file bugs (on top of violations of the MUST
> directive) requesting that either the conffile is split into a
> seperate package (say you alread
Hi,
over the weekend I did some work on multiarch again and did notice
some new and old problems when adding more libraries to my test set.
Given that the problems are quite easily detectable I'm considering
scanning all packages for their occurance and reporting bugs for them.
In detail I'm look
14 matches
Mail list logo
