I've reviewed the copyright file for the 66 bugs that I reported,
manually, and I also inspected at least one claimed non-free file in
each package. I should have done this from the start, but I felt
(over-)confident that there wouldn't be false positives.
I found one file that likely is a false
Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [Simon Josefsson]
>> Do you have suggestions to improve the situation?
>
> I would suspect manual inspection of each file, and only file bugs for
> the files with real license problems. Using the file name to guess
> about the existence of a serio
[Simon Josefsson]
> Do you have suggestions to improve the situation?
I would suspect manual inspection of each file, and only file bugs for
the files with real license problems. Using the file name to guess
about the existence of a serious bug is not acceptable.
How many bugs did you file? A
3 matches
Mail list logo
