Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Iain R. Learmonth"
* Package name: hamradio-maintguide
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Iain R. Learmonth
* License : BSD-2-clause maybe
Programming Lang: Sphinx
Description : Debian Hamradio Maintainers Guide
Hi Pierre,
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:17:12PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Again, the discussion isn't (for me) about a tool, but an exchange
> format. We are discussing having patches served in a quilt series, and
okay, this approach is similar but different. So you want a quilt
series, but
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 06:24:38PM +, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> So, I would agree with those recommending quilt, if it has significant
> pros besides dpatch. That would be forcing to a specific tool and so
> giving up some diversity, but it would keep giving up freedom of choice
> on a low le
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 12:40:14AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> This seems to be much cleaner than dpatch or quilt. Also with the help
> of gitk, history is much more visible. I look forward to see it matured
> and accepted.
personally I am a fan of the diversity in the Debian project. Its re
Hmmm...
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:51:41PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> I ended up updating NM guide which only had dpatch to current one with
> quilt:
>
> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/ch-build.en.html#s-dpatch
As I read this thread back to d-project, ... interesting. It all star
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:51:05AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 25/01/08 at 08:01 +, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > As a second runner up, quilt is ok by me. :)
>
> I made some stats (see [1]). 7.8% of our packages use quilt, while 14.4%
> use dpatch.
This was discussed in debian-doc a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jari Aalto wrote:
> [Please keep CC]
>
> Where should the bugs found in "Debian New Maintainers' Guide" be
> reported? BTS package name?
maint-guide?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=maint-guide
Bes
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007, Jari Aalto wrote:
> Where should the bugs found in "Debian New Maintainers' Guide" be
> reported? BTS package name?
maint-guide
[no Cc:, I read the list]
--
Mohammed Adnène Trojette
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &
HellO!
On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 18:02:34 +0100, Jari Aalto wrote:
> Where should the bugs found in "Debian New Maintainers' Guide" be
> reported? BTS package name?
=
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -s maint-guide | grep Description
Description: Debian New Maintainers&#x
[Please keep CC]
Where should the bugs found in "Debian New Maintainers' Guide" be
reported? BTS package name?
Jari
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tollef Fog Heen writes:
> Are you able to claim that source code written is not under copyright in
> any way? It's less than 70 years after the author's death (even for
> really old code from, say, 1950) and if it clearly is copyrightable, it
> will be under copyright.
If it was written by a US g
* Anthony DeRobertis
| Well, isn't prohibiting the "I didn't know it is copyrighted" defence
| the only legal effect of having the notice nowadays, anyway?
Are you able to claim that source code written is not under copyright
in any way? It's less than 70 years after the author's death (even
fo
Hello Anthony,
Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>>This has to include a copyright year, also.
>>
>> ...and following additional discussion, the resolution is:
>>
>>After considering the suggestion, I have decided to close this
>>bug.
>>
> The yea
Scripsit Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 03:51:30PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
>> Only for some pretty strange values of "worthless". AFAIU the only
>> legal effect of the notice requirements you cite is as defined by
>> subsection (d): if a compliant notice is
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 03:51:30PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Only for some pretty strange values of "worthless". AFAIU the only
> legal effect of the notice requirements you cite is as defined by
> subsection (d): if a compliant notice is present, a defendant is
> excluded from the defense t
Scripsit Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The year really should be included. At least in the US, not having a
> year in the notice appears to make the notice worthless. Quoting Title
> 17 USC Sec. 401(b):
Only for some pretty strange values of "worthless". AFAIU the only
legal effect of
Jeremy Stanley wrote:
This has to include a copyright year, also.
...and following additional discussion, the resolution is:
After considering the suggestion, I have decided to close this
bug.
The year really should be included. At least in the US, not having a
year in the notice a
7; Palfrader wrote a nice little "How (not) to
> >>> write copyright files"[1]. Please read that *now*.
> >>> [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/12/msg7.html
> >> [...]
> >> Why not add this to the New Maintainers Guide inst
copyright files"[1]. Please read that *now*.
>>> [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/12/msg7.html
>> [...]
>> Why not add this to the New Maintainers Guide instead of
>> forcing Applicants to search the mailing list archive for
>> this?
>
&
I just can't locate copyright statement anywhere within the package --
only license file (MPL 1.1/GPL 2.0/LGPL 2.1)
is copyright assumed to belong to upstream author? what years then
should be mentioned?
--
.-.
=-- /v\
;
> > [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/12/msg7.html
>
> [...]
> Why not add this to the New Maintainers Guide instead of
> forcing Applicants to search the mailing list archive for
> this?
Furthermore, the format given in the message is dissimilar
bian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/12/msg00007.html
> [...]
> Why not add this to the New Maintainers Guide instead of
> forcing Applicants to search the mailing list archive for
> this?
Feel free to submit patches to wherever it may get added.
--
bye Joerg
>Starting network manag
ml
[...]
Why not add this to the New Maintainers Guide instead of
forcing Applicants to search the mailing list archive for
this?
Regards Nico
--
Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 0x73647CFF
http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org
Forget about that mouse with 3/4
23 matches
Mail list logo
