Hi Sébastien, hi all,
On Di, 28 Mai 2013, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> AFAIK, makeinfo is not able to render @math blocks as images (formatted
> with LaTeX), while texi2html does. The output of math formulas with
On the bug-texinfo list I got the following answer from
Patrice Dumas, the author:
O
Le mardi 28 mai 2013 16:48:50, Ryan Kavanagh a écrit :
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 08:28:37PM -0400, Ryan Kavanagh wrote:
> > See attached for a dd-list of affected packages.
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 04:37:44PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > Please attach a list of packages run through
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:29:07AM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Have you checked indirect build-dependencies on texi2html (e.g. the
> package build depends on foo, which depends on texi2html)?
ryan@nu:~$ reverse-depends texi2html
Reverse-Depends
===
* translate-docformat
Packages wi
Am Dienstag, den 28.05.2013, 22:45 -0400 schrieb Ryan Kavanagh:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 05:08:06PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > There have been two responses to your proposal so far, neither of
> > which particularly looks to be in favor of your plan. I don't think
> > it's reasonable to pro
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:45:25PM -0400, Ryan Kavanagh wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 05:08:06PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > There have been two responses to your proposal so far, neither of
> > which particularly looks to be in favor of your plan. I don't think
> > it's reasonable to proc
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 05:08:06PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> There have been two responses to your proposal so far, neither of
> which particularly looks to be in favor of your plan. I don't think
> it's reasonable to proceed with a mass-bug filing on over 800 packages
> as a first step, cert
On Di, 28 Mai 2013, Ryan Kavanagh wrote:
> Norbert, as Texinfo maintainer, do you know if upstream has an ITA for
> when the math-images-in-HTML will arrive in makeinfo?
No I don't know, but I have forwarded the question to bug-texinfo,
let us see what we get.
Norbert
---
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:06:23PM -0400, Ryan Kavanagh wrote:
> As a final notice, unless I get any objections (there have been none so
> far), I plan to go forward with the MBF at 03:00UTC on 2013-05-29. As
> explained on the Texi2htmlTransition wiki page[0], if you are
> unwilling/unable to tran
As a final notice, unless I get any objections (there have been none so
far), I plan to go forward with the MBF at 03:00UTC on 2013-05-29. As
explained on the Texi2htmlTransition wiki page[0], if you are
unwilling/unable to transition to texinfo due to missing math rendering,
please mark your bug a
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 08:28:37PM -0400, Ryan Kavanagh wrote:
> See attached for a dd-list of affected packages.
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 04:37:44PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Please attach a list of packages run through dd-list before doing the MBF.
Sorry, I guess I forgot to actuall
On 28/05/13 16:01, Ryan Kavanagh wrote:
On the basis of Sébastien's objection, I propose the MBF to have
severity wishlist and the following amended text. Not everybody will be
able to transition from texi2html, but those who can should. It will be
easier to transition the remaining few packages
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 08:45:04AM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> AFAIK, makeinfo is not able to render @math blocks as images (formatted
> with LaTeX), while texi2html does. The output of math formulas with
> makeinfo --html is very ugly, since it basically dumps the Texi/LaTeX
> source of the
Le lundi 27 mai 2013 à 20:28 -0400, Ryan Kavanagh a écrit :
> In coordination with Norbert Preining, I propose a MBF against all
> packages depending on or build-depending on texi2html, asking them to
> transition from the `texi2html' utility to the `makeinfo' utility from
> the texinfo package, wi
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Ryan Kavanagh wrote:
> In coordination with Norbert Preining, I propose a MBF against all
> packages depending on or build-depending on texi2html, asking them to
> transition from the `texi2html' utility to the `makeinfo' utility from
> the texinfo package, with th
In coordination with Norbert Preining, I propose a MBF against all
packages depending on or build-depending on texi2html, asking them to
transition from the `texi2html' utility to the `makeinfo' utility from
the texinfo package, with the end goal of being able to remove the
texi2html package from t
15 matches
Mail list logo
