[ adding -qa for the neglected-packages-busting part ]
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 03:59:33PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> My own reading of this thread is that we can go ahead with this MBF.
> You can find attached the template and actual package list, ready for
> mass-bug invocation. Barring n
Le dimanche 13 février 2011 à 17:57 +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> IMHO one upload per Debian release with a recent Standards-Version
> should be done for every package. It shows that the maintainer is
> active and continues to be interested in the package. Given that our
> release cycle is >
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 12:23:46PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > PS lintian has a warning-level tag about that [2], which reports 250
> >packages vs 279 reported by my script. I'll check where the
> >differences come from before actually reporting the bugs.
> >
> Isn't the lintian warni
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 02:36:02PM +0100, Luca Capello wrote:
> >> That might also be a sign of packages lacking love, maybe some of them
> >> should be orphaned or dropped instead?
I used the "Missing homepage field in debian/control" on the Blends
tasks pages to enable some QA work which finally
Hi there!
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 12:31:54 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 12:27:34PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> Stefano Zacchiroli (13/02/2011):
>> > I hereby propose a mass bug filing, severity minor, requesting
>> > migration to the proper debian/control field.
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 12:27:34PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Stefano Zacchiroli (13/02/2011):
> > I hereby propose a mass bug filing, severity minor, requesting
> > migration to the proper debian/control field.
>
> That might also be a sign of packages lacking love, maybe some of them
> sho
Stefano Zacchiroli (13/02/2011):
> I hereby propose a mass bug filing, severity minor, requesting
> migration to the proper debian/control field.
That might also be a sign of packages lacking love, maybe some of them
should be orphaned or dropped instead?
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digit
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 12:12:51 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> PS lintian has a warning-level tag about that [2], which reports 250
>packages vs 279 reported by my script. I'll check where the
>differences come from before actually reporting the bugs.
>
Isn't the lintian warning enou
Upgrading my own server to Squeeze, I've stumbled upon some stats that
I've been maintaining for quite a while. One of them is about how Debian
packages declare upstream homepage, by using either the old "Homepage"
pseudo-header in package description or the new field as per policy
§5.6.23, or both
9 matches
Mail list logo
