Re: List of packages needing a new maintainer

2000-12-31 Thread John Lapeyre
*Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Below is a listing of packages needing a new maintainer. I know that In case someone wants to pick up a package, I'll note which packages (of mine) I think are likely to have some reasonably sized user base. Some others may be popular too, I just don't know about the

Re: List of packages needing a new maintainer

2000-12-29 Thread Colin Watson
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Below is a listing of packages needing a new maintainer. Speaking of which, dome hasn't had a maintainer upload in over four years, and it could do with somebody paying a little attention to it (apart from anything else, it's Standards-Version: 2.1.1.0)

Re: List of packages needing a new maintainer

2000-12-29 Thread Decklin Foster
Toni Mueller writes: > > RFA: netcat -- TCP/IP swiss army knife > > I'll take a look, maybe i take this over. Already in Incoming ;-) -- things change. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: List of packages needing a new maintainer

2000-12-29 Thread Toni Mueller
Hello, On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 04:50:58PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > RFA: netcat -- TCP/IP swiss army knife I'll take a look, maybe i take this over. Best Regards, --Toni++

Re: List of packages needing a new maintainer

2000-12-28 Thread Daniel Kobras
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Martin Schulze wrote: > Daniel Kobras wrote: > > > O: manpages-de -- German manpages > > > > I'd be willing to take them, if it's just for the Debian maintainership > > and fixing the few outstanding bugs. However, Joey, I see you are also > > Please take over Debian maintain

Re: List of packages needing a new maintainer

2000-12-28 Thread Martin Schulze
Daniel Kobras wrote: > On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > > Below is a listing of packages needing a new maintainer. I know that > > all the information is in the WNPP already, but I thought it would > > be a good idea to post a summary since the WNPP bugs were not CCed > > here. >

Re: List of packages needing a new maintainer

2000-12-28 Thread Daniel Kobras
On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Below is a listing of packages needing a new maintainer. I know that > all the information is in the WNPP already, but I thought it would > be a good idea to post a summary since the WNPP bugs were not CCed > here. [...] > Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROT

Re: List of packages needing a new maintainer

2000-12-26 Thread Peter Eckersley
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 04:50:58PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > RFA: gdict -- small GTK app to retrieve definitions from MIT's dictionary > server Ummm... it *seems* like gdict has been swallowed by gnome-utils. If that weren't the case, I would have volunteered. -- |> |= -+- |= |> | |

Re: List of packages needing a new maintainer

2000-12-26 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 26 December 2000 16:50, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Below is a listing of packages needing a new maintainer. I know that > all the information is in the WNPP already, but I thought it would > be a good idea to post a summary since the WNPP bu

List of packages needing a new maintainer

2000-12-26 Thread Martin Michlmayr
Below is a listing of packages needing a new maintainer. I know that all the information is in the WNPP already, but I thought it would be a good idea to post a summary since the WNPP bugs were not CCed here. If you want any of these packages, please look up the bug number at http://bugs.debian.o