Re: [OT] MES-2 [Was: Re: Linux Fonts]

2002-08-19 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 11:11:06PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 06:25:28PM +0200, Radovan Garabik wrote: > > free high quality variable width font. Dustimo could become > > base of such a font, if it covered at least MES-2 repertoire (maybe > > without Georgian and Armenian

[OT] MES-2 [Was: Re: Linux Fonts]

2002-08-19 Thread Drew Parsons
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 06:25:28PM +0200, Radovan Garabik wrote: > free high quality variable width font. Dustimo could become > base of such a font, if it covered at least MES-2 repertoire (maybe > without Georgian and Armenian characters for the beginning). Just out of interest, what is MES-2?

Re: Linux Fonts

2002-08-18 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
On Sun, 2002-08-18 at 20:55, Dustin Norlander wrote: > http://www.cheapskatefonts.com/Dustismo_screenshot.jpg Especially at smaller sizes, that needs some kerning adjustments. !@ looks horrible, for example, at least at 10pt and below. At 8pt most every letter runs into each other. But, it's muc

Re: Linux Fonts

2002-08-18 Thread Dustin Norlander
Thanks for the screenshot. I must say that it looks terrible. As I said before I embedded bitmaps instead of doing the hinting, and I found out from the XFree86 mailing list that its font renderer does not support embedded bitmaps. So I guess its back to the drawing (hinting) board. Just for

Re: Linux Fonts

2002-08-18 Thread Ari Makela
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 09:07:47AM -0700, Dustin Mofos wrote: > As far as the characters you mentioned specifically > they should be there, in fact I can see them using > Dustismo right now (except for ?? which I have no idea > what they are). Thanks much for the link, I can see > now that I am

Re: Linux Fonts

2002-08-18 Thread Radovan Garabik
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 09:07:47AM -0700, Dustin Mofos wrote: > Sorry, what I think of as a full character set is > defineatly not what someone else might think of as a > full set (I only have experience with english text).. > As far as the characters you mentioned specifically > they should be th

Re: Linux Fonts

2002-08-15 Thread Ben Armstrong
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 12:22:41PM -0700, Dustin Mofos wrote: > Making a perfectly hinted font is very, very diffecult > (the guy who made Times New Roman has said he spent 2+ > years on the hinting alone). I chose to embed bitmaps > for all the smaller sizes (no small chore). Is it > possible tha

Re: Linux Fonts

2002-08-15 Thread Dustin Mofos
> > I have viewed the font with gfontview. It looks OK > in a few sizes and not > so OK in some others. So I'm guessing the hinting > is not perfect yet > (either that, or this is a limitation of libttf's > handling of the hinting > ... hmm, as an aside, I wonder why gfontview uses > libttf2 (Fr

Re: Linux Fonts

2002-08-15 Thread Ben Armstrong
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 11:40:44AM -0700, Michael Cardenas wrote: > Yes, you're right about removing the free part. I simply wanted to > make a single package of truetype fonts for ease of use. I see now > that there are a number of ttf packages, but they seem to all be asian > charsets. I'm trying

Re: Linux Fonts

2002-08-15 Thread Michael Cardenas
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 03:24:02PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote: > > If noone else has offered, I'd love to package this font for inclusion > > in debian, or include it a free-ttfonts package with a few other gpl > > tt fonts. > > I question the name free-ttfonts. The convention seems to be: > >

Re: Linux Fonts

2002-08-15 Thread Ben Armstrong
In case Dustin doesn't pick up on this today ... On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 10:32:15AM -0700, Michael Cardenas wrote: > I'll check it out asap. Have you viewed it in linux yet? I have viewed the font with gfontview. It looks OK in a few sizes and not so OK in some others. So I'm guessing the hinti

Re: Linux Fonts

2002-08-15 Thread Michael Cardenas
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 06:47:21AM -0700, Dustin Mofos wrote: > Hello all, > > Thanks everyone for the advice on what license to > release my font under. I looked at all the options > and decided to just go with the standard GPL. > Great! In this thread: Bug#156503: microsoft changed its pol

Re: Linux Fonts

2002-08-15 Thread Dustin Mofos
Sorry, what I think of as a full character set is defineatly not what someone else might think of as a full set (I only have experience with english text).. As far as the characters you mentioned specifically they should be there, in fact I can see them using Dustismo right now (except for  whi

Re: Linux Fonts

2002-08-15 Thread Radovan Garabik
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 06:47:21AM -0700, Dustin Mofos wrote: > Hello all, > > Thanks everyone for the advice on what license to > release my font under. I looked at all the options > and decided to just go with the standard GPL. > > I have spent a lot of time on this font and it is > nearly d

Re: Linux Fonts

2002-08-15 Thread Ben Armstrong
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 06:47:21AM -0700, Dustin Mofos wrote: > Download the font here: > http://www.cheapskatefonts.com/fonts/Dustismo.zip Hm. I tried dropping it in as a replacement for tuxpaint's current font (simply by renaming the fonts in /usr/share/tuxpaint/fonts out of the way and copying

Re: Linux Fonts

2002-08-15 Thread Jesus Climent
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 06:47:21AM -0700, Dustin Mofos wrote: > Hello all, > > Thanks everyone for the advice on what license to > release my font under. I looked at all the options > and decided to just go with the standard GPL. Great! Do you have any example of the font on your web page? I

Linux Fonts

2002-08-15 Thread Dustin Mofos
Hello all, Thanks everyone for the advice on what license to release my font under. I looked at all the options and decided to just go with the standard GPL. I have spent a lot of time on this font and it is nearly done. it is a pretty standard sans-serif set, including all the accent and spe