Michael Meskes writes:
>> As far as I know, the FTP masters still use 2.4.3 (before the leading
>> "/" and "./" was removed from file names and before the merge of
>> embedded-$lib -> embedded-library).
> Right, this is wha I expected as the source of the problem. Is there a
> reason why the sys
> As far as I know, the FTP masters still use 2.4.3 (before the leading
> "/" and "./" was removed from file names and before the merge of
> embedded-$lib -> embedded-library).
Right, this is wha I expected as the source of the problem. Is there a reason
why the system uses an older version? Are w
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 05:35:27PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Not all of the rejections are weak rejections you can override:
>
> http://ftp-master.debian.org/#rejections
Right, but my one is listed as nonfatal and the email even said I should
override if I need this.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
M
On 05/29/2011 05:31 PM, Michael Meskes wrote:
> I received an auto-reject because of a lintian error message that, as my
> system
> says, is correctly overridden. Could anyone please tell me which lintian
> version we use to determine auto-rejection and also which lintian version
> we're
> suppos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-05-29 17:31, Michael Meskes wrote:
> I received an auto-reject because of a lintian error message that, as my
> system
> says, is correctly overridden. Could anyone please tell me which lintian
> version we use to determine auto-rejection an
I received an auto-reject because of a lintian error message that, as my system
says, is correctly overridden. Could anyone please tell me which lintian
version we use to determine auto-rejection and also which lintian version we're
supposed to prepare overrides for?
Should the version be the same
6 matches
Mail list logo
