Hi,
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 09:22:35PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 07:29:05PM +0200, Gernot Salzer wrote:
> >> Copyright:
> >>
> >> * xpbiff - popup biff for X
> >> *
> >> * Author: Kazuhiko Shutoh, 1993
> >> *
> >> * Perm
Ulrich Eckhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 13 Aug 2000, Roland Bauerschmidt wrote:
> > As Goswin mentioned earlier it's also possible to use bochs with some
> > other bios
> [snip]
>
> I´m not sure if this even touches this discussion but what about using the
> bios
> that is already
On Sun, 13 Aug 2000, Roland Bauerschmidt wrote:
> As Goswin mentioned earlier it's also possible to use bochs with some
> other bios
[snip]
I´m not sure if this even touches this discussion but what about using the bios
that is already present on most computers?
Wouldn´t that reduce the dependen
I originally ITPed bochs. Unfortunately it would have to go in non-free.
the VGA-BIOS included is licensed only for use and distribution with
bochs. It therefor cannot be seperated into a seperate package from
bochs (and if bochs is packaged, it should ge removed from the source
archive.
Andrew
Thanks to those of you that commented on this. The author replied to
my e-mail, saying "GPL is cool for me!" so our problem is solved :-)
John
Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>I've already written to the author, but can y'all tell me if the
>following license is acceptable in main
"Jules Bean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Gotcha. Well, I think that the license could be made more explicit
> > about permitting redistribution, etc., but as is I don't see any
> > actual problems.
>
> I would suggest you email the author for clarification.
I have already sent him an e-mail
--On Tue, Jun 16, 1998 4:09 pm -0400 "Ben Pfaff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>PilRC is freeware.
>>...
>>Source code is available. You are free to make enhancements, but
please
>>send the changes back to me so I can fo
Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>PilRC is freeware.
>...
>Source code is available. You are free to make enhancements, but please
>send the changes back to me so I can fold them into the main sources.
>
> I see no problems with either clause, but what d
Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>PilRC is freeware.
>...
>Source code is available. You are free to make enhancements, but please
>send the changes back to me so I can fold them into the main sources.
>
> I see no problems with either clause, but what did you leave out in
>
I've already written to the author, but can y'all tell me if the
following license is acceptable in main?
PilRC is freeware.
...
Source code is available. You are free to make enhancements, but please
send the changes back to me so I can fold them into the main sources.
I see
Hi,
I've already written to the author, but can y'all tell me if the
following license is acceptable in main?
PilRC is freeware.
...
Source code is available. You are free to make enhancements, but please
send the changes back to me so I can fold them into the main sources.
That's it.
--
Jo
On Wed, 3 Jun 1998, Steve Phillips wrote:
> I intend to package v2html, the verilog to HTML converter. I have a
> question about the license though: Would the following be OK to allow it
> in main?
No way.
It says you can't charge for distribution.
So CD people can't even put it on their CDs..
I intend to package v2html, the verilog to HTML converter. I have a
question about the license though: Would the following be OK to allow it
in main?
--
Steve PhillipsPhone: (715) 830-1200 x109
Silicon Logic Engineering, LLPFAX: (715) 830-1887
131 South
13 matches
Mail list logo
