On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:09 PM, James Y Knight wrote:
>
> On Apr 28, 2010, at 11:32 AM, James Y Knight wrote:
>>
>> After checking a scattering of random packages, I happened across one
>> example of this already in Debian testing: socat. It is GPLv2-only, and is
>> linked against GPLv3 libread
On Apr 28, 2010, at 11:32 AM, James Y Knight wrote:
After checking a scattering of random packages, I happened across
one example of this already in Debian testing: socat. It is GPLv2-
only, and is linked against GPLv3 libreadline6 in testing. (filed
bug 579494).
One further note: Fedora se
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 06:27:35PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 19:07:56 +0200
> Jakub Wilk wrote:
>
> > * Neil Williams , 2010-04-28, 17:48:
> > >> After checking a scattering of random packages, I happened across
> > >> one example of this already in Debian testing: socat.
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 19:07:56 +0200
Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Neil Williams , 2010-04-28, 17:48:
> >> After checking a scattering of random packages, I happened across
> >> one example of this already in Debian testing: socat. It is
> >> GPLv2-only, and is linked against GPLv3 libreadline6 in testing.
* Neil Williams , 2010-04-28, 17:48:
After checking a scattering of random packages, I happened across
one example of this already in Debian testing: socat. It is
GPLv2-only, and is linked against GPLv3 libreadline6 in testing.
(filed bug 579494).
Umm:
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/poo
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 11:32:36 -0400
James Y Knight wrote:
> After checking a scattering of random packages, I happened across
> one example of this already in Debian testing: socat. It is
> GPLv2-only, and is linked against GPLv3 libreadline6 in testing.
> (filed bug 579494).
Umm:
http://package
* James Y Knight , 2010-04-28, 11:32:
One of those (#553741) was filed against CLisp, which is licensed
under GPLv2-only. Unfortunately, readline is under the GPLv3+ as of
version 6, so making that change is impossible to do legally.
It's not the first time license change in a library triggers
James Y Knight, le Wed 28 Apr 2010 11:32:36 -0400, a écrit :
> After checking a scattering of random packages, I happened across one example
> of this already in Debian testing: socat. It is GPLv2-only, and is linked
> against GPLv3 libreadline6 in testing. (filed bug 579494).
Worse than that: a p
I noticed that there's a bunch of bugs filed to transition packages
depending on libreadline5-dev to libreadline-dev so that they can
transition to using libreadline6. [1].
One of those (#553741) was filed against CLisp, which is licensed
under GPLv2-only. Unfortunately, readline is under t
9 matches
Mail list logo
