also sprach Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.10.06.2211 +0200]:
> > From glancing over the patch, it *also* replaces parts of the
> > non IPsec i.e. standard IP stack. Maybe it provides the same
> > functionality to the end user. It does *not* provide the same
> > functionality to the dev
On Monday 06 October 2003 21:11, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> kernel developers dont use the debian source package as a base
> for their work.
I have in the past for writing device drivers. Admittedly none are in the
mainstream kernel (afaik) but that is not the point.
Tom
--
^__^| T
* martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031006 21:57]:
> > The IPSEC stack does nothing unless you specify policies through
> > PFKEY or NETLINK. In other words, it is disabled by default.
>
> From glancing over the patch, it *also* replaces parts of the non
> IPsec i.e. standard IP stack. Maybe i
also sprach Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.10.03.1016 +0200]:
> > I cannot disable IPsec at runtime as I cannot replace the IP stack
> > at runtime, and it modifies the IP stack. Moreover, you state the
>
> The IPSEC stack does nothing unless you specify policies through
> PFKEY or NETLINK.
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * If it's a feature, can it be disabled/enabled at runtime?
>
>Sinec we're making generic kernels, this is a must. The presence
>of the patch should not prevent me from doing something that I would
>otherwise be able to do.
>
> I canno
also sprach Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.10.03.0121 +0200]:
> I have given you the reason for this many times already. Please
> reread the thread on debian-devel carefully.
This one post did in fact slip my eyes. In it, you mention some
checks when it comes to patch inclusion.
I have a p
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 07:40:23PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
>
> The "error" message is:
>
> BIOS data check successful
That message comes from LILO. It sounds as if you've got a
boot loader problem that is triggered by the Debian kernels.
See if you can get it to load by removing the initr
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 08:11:41PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Which 2.4.19 kernel package did you install and what is the exact
> error message?
The "error" message is:
BIOS data check successful
Interestingly the very same message is printed my my manually installed
2.4.18 kernel, but not by th
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 08:11:41PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Which 2.4.19 kernel package did you install and what is the exact
> error message?
2.4.19-k7.
As for the BIOS message, I will look it up when I get to the machine the
next time. It may take a day or two though. Anyway, that message did
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> makes it boot but later I get a lost interrupt on hda. Now I installed
> 2.4.19 and do get that message about bios checksum or so. But after that
> it stands still again.
Which 2.4.19 kernel package did you install and what is the exact
error message?
Hi,
I've been using self compiled kernels throughout the years and up to
2.4.18 never experienced a problem. But Now I tried switching to the
debian kernel and cannot do that at all. When using 2.4.18 the first try
ends before "Uncompressing ..." is written on the screen. A reset then
makes it boo
Yves Arrouye writes ("Re: Pb: gdb cannot read core from 2.0.8 (is it a gdb or
kernel problem)?"):
...
> But the message is really misleading... It would ne nice if Gdb checked
> wether the prog arg was a core first, and in this case tell that's the
> case and remind usage.
Miquel van Smoorenburg writes:
> You (Yves Arrouye) wrote:
> > GDB 4.15.1 (i486-linux), Copyright 1995 Free Software Foundation, Inc...
> >
> > "0¨´
> > @/core": not in executable format: File format not recognized
> >
> > So there's a problem there. Do you have an idea about who is fa
You (Yves Arrouye) wrote:
> GDB 4.15.1 (i486-linux), Copyright 1995 Free Software Foundation, Inc...
>
> "0¨´
> @/core": not in executable format: File format not recognized
>
> So there's a problem there. Do you have an idea about who is faulty? Gdb?
As I understand it, the way you call gdb
marin157# file core
core: ELF 32-bit LSB core file, Intel 80386, version 1, stripped
marin158# gdb core
GDB is free software and you are welcome to distribute copies of it
under certain conditions; type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB; type "show warra
15 matches
Mail list logo
