Guillem Jover writes:
> Hi!
>
> On Sat, 2025-02-01 at 22:33:16 +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
>> On Sat, 2025-02-01 at 17:35 +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
>> > But also, in this particular case, it's not the issue of the spec but of a
>> > particular tool trying to enforce the rule.
>> >
>> > I
Hi!
On Sat, 2025-02-01 at 22:33:16 +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> On Sat, 2025-02-01 at 17:35 +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> > But also, in this particular case, it's not the issue of the spec but of a
> > particular tool trying to enforce the rule.
> >
> > I'll file a bug to fix it.
> I fin
Hi,
On Sat, 2025-02-01 at 17:35 +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> But also, in this particular case, it's not the issue of the spec but of a
> particular tool trying to enforce the rule.
>
> I'll file a bug to fix it.
I finally found many reports already dealing with this issue in the bug tracker.
Hi Jonas,
On Sat, 2025-02-01 at 17:05 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Abou Al Montacir (2025-02-01 16:13:44)
> >
> > >
> > On Sat, 2025-02-01 at 14:37 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > Quoting Simon McVittie (2025-02-01 14:21:38)
> > > > On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 at 13:13:32 +0100, Abou Al
Quoting Abou Al Montacir (2025-02-01 16:13:44)
>
> >
> On Sat, 2025-02-01 at 14:37 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Quoting Simon McVittie (2025-02-01 14:21:38)
> > > On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 at 13:13:32 +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> > > > Bug-
> > > > Upstream:
> > > > https://gitlab.com/freepa
On Sat, Feb 1, 2025 at 10:14 AM Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> With regards to other possible values (No, NotNeeded), I find it a bit hacky
> to use this field to provide an upstream bug URL.
> I would completely remove this practice and keep this field human readable
> and understandable to be a sim
>
On Sat, 2025-02-01 at 14:37 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Simon McVittie (2025-02-01 14:21:38)
> > On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 at 13:13:32 +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> > > Bug-
> > > Upstream: https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/lazarus/lazarus/-/issues/41378
> >
> > I believe the intende
On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 at 13:13:32 +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> Bug-Upstream: https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/lazarus/lazarus/-/issues/41378
I believe the intended DEP-3 syntax for this is:
Bug: https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/lazarus/lazarus/-/issues/41378
so using that instead of Bug-Upst
Quoting Simon McVittie (2025-02-01 14:21:38)
> On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 at 13:13:32 +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> > Bug-Upstream:
> > https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/lazarus/lazarus/-/issues/41378
>
> I believe the intended DEP-3 syntax for this is:
>
> Bug: https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/laz
Hi Abou,
Quoting Abou Al Montacir (2025-02-01 13:13:32)
> According
> to https://udd.debian.org/patches.cgi?src=lazarus&version=3.8%2Bdfsg1-4 my
> package have a patch with invalid metadata. There seem to be that the tool
> considers the following as an error:
> Forwarded: Yes
> Bug-Upstream: http
Hi All,
According
to https://udd.debian.org/patches.cgi?src=lazarus&version=3.8%2Bdfsg1-4 my
package have a patch with invalid metadata. There seem to be that the tool
considers the following as an error:
Forwarded: Yes
Bug-Upstream: https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/lazarus/lazarus/-/issues/41378
11 matches
Mail list logo
