"Ben" == Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben> `autoconf' and `standards', where `autoconf' contains autoconf
Ben> proper and `standards' includes the GNU coding and package
Ben> maintenance standards.
Guess I'll buck the trend and vote for 'standards' -- its what
upstream has always called
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.5
Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 12:58:37 -0400
Source: autoconf
Binary: autoconf gnu-standards
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.13-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
autoconf - automatic configur
On Sun, May 16, 1999 at 01:35:35PM -0400, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> I'm splitting the GNU autoconf package into two packages, `autoconf'
>> and `standards', where `autoconf' contains autoconf proper and
>> `standards' includes the GNU coding and package maintenance standards.
>>
>> O
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Sun, May 16, 1999 at 01:28:48PM -0400, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> I'm splitting the GNU autoconf package into two packages, `autoconf'
> and `standards', where `autoconf' contains autoconf proper and
> `standards' includes the GNU coding and pack
On Sun, May 16, 1999 at 01:28:48PM -0400, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> I'm splitting the GNU autoconf package into two packages, `autoconf'
> and `standards', where `autoconf' contains autoconf proper and
> `standards' includes the GNU coding and package maintenance standards.
>
> Objections?
How about gnu
On Sun, May 16, 1999 at 13:28:48 -0400, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Objections?
See subject. Please consider something less generic like "gnu-standards"
instead.
Ray
--
J.H.M. Dassen | RUMOUR Believe all you hear. Your world may
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | not be a better one than the one
I'm splitting the GNU autoconf package into two packages, `autoconf'
and `standards', where `autoconf' contains autoconf proper and
`standards' includes the GNU coding and package maintenance standards.
Objections?
7 matches
Mail list logo