Re: Intent to package gbdk.

1999-01-29 Thread John Lapeyre
There have been several packages allowed into main with a license like this. Some people don't like it however. Perl's license is even slightly more restricive. Except that now it can be licensed under the GPL as well. From: John Lapeyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 29 Jan 1999 12:44:5

Re: Intent to package gbdk.

1999-01-29 Thread John Hasler
Ben Pfaff writes: > That doesn't make it non-free. It's in the standard BSD license. The word 'fee' does not occur in the standard BSD license. It does not mention money at all. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler) Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI

Re: Intent to package gbdk.

1999-01-29 Thread John Hasler
> The reason for non-free is this in copyright: > Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for any > purpose, subject to the provisions described below, without fee is ^^^ Have you contacted the author about this?

Re: Intent to package gbdk.

1999-01-29 Thread Masato Taruishi
At 29 Jan 1999 08:48:54 -0500, Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for any >purpose, subject to the provisions described below, without fee is > ^^^ > That doesn't

Re: Intent to package gbdk.

1999-01-29 Thread Ben Pfaff
Masato Taruishi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: The reason for non-free is this in copyright: Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for any purpose, subject to the provisions described below, without fee is ^

Intent to package gbdk.

1999-01-29 Thread Masato Taruishi
gbdk is a acronym of Gameboy Developer's Kit. This is a description for it. --- Package: gbdk Priority: optional Section: non-free/devel Installed-Size: 649 Maintainer: Masato Taruishi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Version: 2.0.17-3 Depends: libc6 Suggests: gbdk-