Re: Intent to package cygnus-stylesheets

1999-01-20 Thread Adam Di Carlo
On Tue, 19 Jan 1999 04:52:44 -0500, Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > After comparing the sources closely, I don't think they have forked > the sources. All the diffs in the *actual* stylesheets are either > CVS stuff changing, since they reimported norm's stuff, or > side-effects based on

Re: Intent to package cygnus-stylesheets

1999-01-19 Thread Jim Pick
Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > >Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> >Essentially, Cygnus has forked the code. > >> > >> Huh. > > > >That might be a bit strong - I haven't really looked into the > >differences in depth. They are

Re: Intent to package cygnus-stylesheets

1999-01-19 Thread Adam Di Carlo
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >Essentially, Cygnus has forked the code. >> >> Huh. > >That might be a bit strong - I haven't really looked into the >differences in depth. They are being maintained separately, and they >are tracking Norm Wa

Re: Intent to package cygnus-stylesheets

1999-01-19 Thread Jim Pick
Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > >Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I understand that Gnome needs db2* scripts... why do they need the Cygnus > >> stylesheets? > > > >They use them internally at Cygnus for their documentation.

Re: Intent to package cygnus-stylesheets

1999-01-19 Thread Adam Di Carlo
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I understand that Gnome needs db2* scripts... why do they need the Cygnus >> stylesheets? > >They use them internally at Cygnus for their documentation. They are >unsupported for outside use. > >Don't ask me w

Re: Intent to package cygnus-stylesheets

1999-01-19 Thread Jim Pick
Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >Essentially, Cygnus has forked the code. > > Huh. That might be a bit strong - I haven't really looked into the differences in depth. They are being maintained separately, and they are tracking Norm Walsh's stuff. > I understand that Gnome needs d

Re: Intent to package cygnus-stylesheets

1999-01-19 Thread Adam Di Carlo
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I thought they needed this db2* scriptage. The db2* scripts kinda >> suck if you ask me (and not comment from upstream on my specific >> technical arguments why they suck) but I'm happy to include them. >> Ple

Re: Intent to package cygnus-stylesheets

1999-01-19 Thread Jim Pick
Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > >Soon, I'm going to upload a "cygnus-stylesheets" package. It's > >basically the same thing as the docbook-stylesheets package, but it > >has some modifications and additional hacks that Mark Galassi has > >a

Re: Intent to package cygnus-stylesheets

1999-01-19 Thread Adam Di Carlo
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >Soon, I'm going to upload a "cygnus-stylesheets" package. It's >basically the same thing as the docbook-stylesheets package, but it >has some modifications and additional hacks that Mark Galassi has >added. > >This package is based on the same source as w

Intent to package cygnus-stylesheets

1999-01-19 Thread Jim Pick
Hi, Soon, I'm going to upload a "cygnus-stylesheets" package. It's basically the same thing as the docbook-stylesheets package, but it has some modifications and additional hacks that Mark Galassi has added. This package is based on the same source as what the Red Hat people are using. The Gno