On Mon, 1 Dec 1997, Brian Bassett wrote:
> I just would like to pick everyone's brains and make sure of something. I
> think that the following copyright would be acceptable under the DFSG:
>
> ---
>
> Copyright (c) 1992-1996 Regents of the University of Michigan.
> All rights reserved.
>
> Re
On 7 Dec 1997, Ed Donovan wrote:
> Some people on debian user had been sharing user-versions of mrtg; I got
> the wrong idea, and thought I was facilitating further packaging work .
> I'm much happier to see that you *are* still working on the project; do
> excuse me.
It's okay. Since I left my p
Dermot -
(Just caught up with the list again; my Gnus setup caught your mail to
the list first and put the direct reply in the 'duplicates' bin.)
As the one making the speculations about your absence, I'm extremely
sorry. I didn't mean to put you in a position of explaining yourself.
Some peopl
Dermot John Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ah I'd missed the bit there about simply renaming the existing tarball
> after extracting the code and before running deb-make. Great, now all my
> updated packages will use pristine source.
You can even just make a symlink with the right name to
On Thu, 4 Dec 1997, Raul Miller wrote:
> >From www.debian.org, hit "developers corner". Then, start with Creating
> a Package using Debmake, after that, hit New-Maintainer's Debian
> Packaging Howto.
Ah I'd missed the bit there about simply renaming the existing tarball
after extracting the code
On Thu, 4 Dec 1997, Joey Hess wrote:
> I hope you don't mind, but I released libc6 versions of libgd and mrtg
> yesterday. I was just going on what someone said that you seemed to have
> stopped maintain packages.
Obviously not straight from the horse's mouth :-)
> The new packages have my name
Dermot John Bradley wrote:
> > I think Dermot Bradley isn't actively maintaining packages.
>
> As for the current state of my packages (and proposed packages):
>
> - libgd & libgd-dev: trying to figure how to build got libc5 and libc6
> versions using debmake - any help welcomed.
>
> - mrtg: dep
Dermot John Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW Can anyone tell me how to create a package based on pristine source
> using debmake?
>From www.debian.org, hit "developers corner". Then, start with Creating
a Package using Debmake, after that, hit New-Maintainer's Debian
Packaging Howto. Get y
On 3 Dec 1997, Ed Donovan wrote:
> I think Dermot Bradley isn't actively maintaining packages. I sent mail
> to one of his addresses, about packaging gated, a while back. I didn't
> hear from him, though I saw gated came off the WNPP list under his name
> later on. His packages in the archive a
Joey Hess wrote:
> Ed Donovan wrote:
> > I think Dermot Bradley isn't actively maintaining packages. I sent mail
> > to one of his addresses, about packaging gated, a while back. I didn't
> > hear from him, though I saw gated came off the WNPP list under his name
> > later on. His packages in th
Ed Donovan wrote:
> I think Dermot Bradley isn't actively maintaining packages. I sent mail
> to one of his addresses, about packaging gated, a while back. I didn't
> hear from him, though I saw gated came off the WNPP list under his name
> later on. His packages in the archive are mrtg, libgd,
Hi -
(Excuse me if I'm cc'ing this around too much.)
I think Dermot Bradley isn't actively maintaining packages. I sent mail
to one of his addresses, about packaging gated, a while back. I didn't
hear from him, though I saw gated came off the WNPP list under his name
later on. His packages in
Oops... forgot about that doc. Sorry for any confusion.
Brian
On Tue, 2 Dec 1997, Adam P. Harris wrote:
>
> [Brian Bassett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> > I was wondering if anyone was working on packaging the University of
> > Michigan's LDAP server and client suite. I noticed that hamm does
> > n
[Brian Bassett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> I was wondering if anyone was working on packaging the University of
> Michigan's LDAP server and client suite. I noticed that hamm does
> not contain anything LDAP related and thought this might be a good
> addition.
According to the debian prospective pack
Hello all,
I was wondering if anyone was working on packaging the University of
Michigan's LDAP server and client suite. I noticed that hamm does not
contain anything LDAP related and thought this might be a good addition.
I just would like to pick everyone's brains and make sure of something.
15 matches
Mail list logo
