Re: Intent to package: mlddc

1998-04-26 Thread Petra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Sat, 25 Apr 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > On Sat, 25 Apr 1998, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > > > > If memory servers, someone took the package from John but I can't recall who > > it was. > > > [snip] > > thanks fo

Re: Intent to package: mlddc

1998-04-26 Thread Anthony Fok
On Sat, Apr 25, 1998 at 01:10:46AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > thanks for jumping to my rescue guys, I just about had a package built ;). > Oh well. I'll have to go find something else to do... It's pretty hard, > every time I think of something it's already there ;). No, it isn't that ha

Re: Intent to package: mlddc

1998-04-25 Thread Petra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Fri, 24 Apr 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Uhm, Hate to tell you, but I already packaged mlddc I belive you can find it in slink (or maybe still incoming) but Mlddc already has a maintainer. - -K > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > Monolith Internet

Re: Intent to package: lightbar (was: Intent to package: mlddc)

1998-04-25 Thread drow
On %M 0, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (That I was still too lazy to fix my attribution line in .muttrc) > thanks for jumping to my rescue guys, I just about had a package built ;). > Oh well. I'll have to go find something else to do... It's pretty hard, > every time I think of something it's already t

Re: Intent to package: mlddc

1998-04-25 Thread vanco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Sat, 25 Apr 1998, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > If memory servers, someone took the package from John but I can't recall who > it was. > [snip] thanks for jumping to my rescue guys, I just about had a package built ;). Oh well. I'll have to go find somethin

Re: Intent to package: mlddc

1998-04-25 Thread vanco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Sat, 25 Apr 1998, Anthony Fok wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 1998 at 04:03:58PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > It is already packaged by John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in March. :-) > [snip] > > Nice idea. :-) The current mlddc package does nothing like

Re: Intent to package: mlddc

1998-04-25 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
We already have a mlddc client package: Package: mlddc Version: 3.2.2-4 Architecture: i386 Depends: libc6 Installed-Size: 27 Maintainer: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: A client for the Monolith dynamic DNS. mlddc is a client for the Monolith ( http://www.ml.org ) dynamic DNS ( DYNDNS, http://

Re: Intent to package: mlddc

1998-04-25 Thread Anthony Fok
On Fri, Apr 24, 1998 at 04:03:58PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Monolith Internet Services offers a public dynamic dns service -- I think > it would be nice to offer a working, tried framework for > auto-initialization of such a doodad. Sorry to disappoint you, but... $ dpkg -s mlddc Pac

Intent to package: mlddc

1998-04-25 Thread vanco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Monolith Internet Services offers a public dynamic dns service -- I think it would be nice to offer a working, tried framework for auto-initialization of such a doodad. Anyway, this will be my first package. I will have it ready in two days, but that sa