Bug#840759: Intent To Package

2018-06-22 Thread Daniel Swarbrick
Package: wnpp Followup-For: Bug #840759 Owner: Daniel Swarbrick I am in the process of packaging this.

Re: Bug#304450: ITP: Intent to Package grabc

2005-04-27 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Sonia Hamilton] > Package: wnpp > Followup-For: Bug #304450 > Owner: Sonia Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I intend to package grabc. Please retitle the bug as described in http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou

Bug#304450: ITP: Intent to Package grabc

2005-04-27 Thread Sonia Hamilton
Package: wnpp Followup-For: Bug #304450 Owner: Sonia Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I intend to package grabc. Homepage: http://muquit.com/muquit/software/grabc/grabc.html License: GPL -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (700, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable')

Intent to package ewiki

2004-12-16 Thread Tiago Bortoletto Vaz
Package: ewiki ErfurtWiki is an implementation of the WikiWikiWeb hypertext system (written in the PHP scripting language). It allows everybody who comes along to edit and create new pages very easily. Copyright: ErfurtWiki is PublicDomain, which means that you can do with it whatever you want

Re: intent to package palo

2001-05-01 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
Em Tue, 01 May 2001 10:10:09 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: > > palo is the PA-RISC/Linux (architecture specific) boot loader Hello, this is not the right way of doing an ITP... you should send it as a bug to wnpp and include aditional information... (like its web page, its license and so on

intent to package palo

2001-05-01 Thread bame
palo is the PA-RISC/Linux (architecture specific) boot loader -Paul Bame [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Intent to package intel-rng-tools.

2001-04-29 Thread David Schleef
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 10:32:59AM +0530, Viral wrote: > > As long as it isn't too bothersome for you, would you mind explaining why > > the kernel doesn't activate it by default? Or why it isn't a `make config' > > option? And why is a daemon needed for it? > > No, its not bothersome to explain.

Re: Intent to package intel-rng-tools.

2001-04-29 Thread Viral
> As long as it isn't too bothersome for you, would you mind explaining why > the kernel doesn't activate it by default? Or why it isn't a `make config' > option? And why is a daemon needed for it? No, its not bothersome to explain. This extract comes from 2.4.4's Documentation/i810_rng.txt. I als

Re: Intent to package intel-rng-tools.

2001-04-28 Thread Alexander Hvostov
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 09:15:39 +0530 Viral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 01:14:22PM -0700, Alexander Hvostov wrote: > > Isn't there a kernel driver for that? > > Yes, but one needs the daemon to use the driver. One could activate it > from /proc, but that was removed and move

Intent to package vcdimager.

2001-04-26 Thread Viral
Hello all, I plan to package vcdimager. From the README : This is GNU VCDImager, a VideoCD image mastering tool. This package contains GNU VCDRip, a VideoCD ripping tool, for ripping mpeg streams from VideoCD images and showing VideoCD information about the image. There already exists cd

Re: Intent to package intel-rng-tools.

2001-04-25 Thread Viral
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 01:14:22PM -0700, Alexander Hvostov wrote: > On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:35:37 +0530 > Viral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I am working on packaging intel-rng-tools. It is the daemon to utilise > > the RNG on i810 boards. Let me know if anyone is working on this. I > shall >

Re: Intent to package intel-rng-tools.

2001-04-25 Thread Alexander Hvostov
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:35:37 +0530 Viral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am working on packaging intel-rng-tools. It is the daemon to utilise > the RNG on i810 boards. Let me know if anyone is working on this. I shall > otherwise upload it tonight. Isn't there a kernel driver for that? Regards,

Intent to package intel-rng-tools.

2001-04-25 Thread Viral
Hi, I am working on packaging intel-rng-tools. It is the daemon to utilise the RNG on i810 boards. Let me know if anyone is working on this. I shall otherwise upload it tonight. Please cc me replies, as I'm not on the list. viral -- And then one day you find ten years have got behind you. No o

Re: intent to package countrycodes

2000-09-08 Thread Nicolás Lichtmaier
> Until these basic packaging paradigms are mastered, I don't think > this package is fit for uploading yet. Perhaps you should ask for > more help in debian-mentors (which is for helping new maintainers)? Besides, there's the little fact that the package is totally useless =). $ grep ^AR /usr/s

Re: intent to package countrycodes

2000-09-04 Thread Paul Slootman
On Sun 03 Sep 2000, Dr. Guenter Bechly wrote: > I intend to package Country Codes 1.0.3, a text-based ISO3166 country code > finder (yes, I know there is a Perl module that does the same, but this > little tool is easier and more flexible). The package is actually already > made > and lintian cl

intent to package countrycodes

2000-09-03 Thread Dr. Guenter Bechly
Hi, I intend to package Country Codes 1.0.3, a text-based ISO3166 country code finder (yes, I know there is a Perl module that does the same, but this little tool is easier and more flexible). The package is actually already made and lintian clean. It can be downloaded from http://www.bechly.de/de

Re: Intent to Package: Lopster

2000-09-03 Thread Colin Mattson
pgpGP9OV5n0Fn.pgp Description: PGP message

Intent to Package: Lopster

2000-09-03 Thread Colin Mattson
pgpvnKDzHpbJ2.pgp Description: PGP message

intent to package snap

2000-08-14 Thread Dr. Guenter Bechly
Hi, I intend to package snap 0.02a, a Perl-based Napster client for console. The package is actually already made, but I have just applied to become a Debian maintainer, thus it will probably still be quite some time till I can upload the package (unless I will find a sponsor). Cheers, Guenter --

Intent to package: eshell, pcomplete

2000-04-01 Thread Takao KAWAMURA
Hi, I am working on the package eshell, a command shell implemented entirely in Emacs Lisp. I am also packaging pcomplete which is included the source archive of eshell. Both eshell and pcomplete are licensed under the GPL. You can get more information about eshell at http://www.emacs.org/~joh

Intent to package: eieio

2000-03-21 Thread Takao KAWAMURA
Hi, I am working on the package eieio, an Emacs lisp program which implements a controlled object-oriented programming methodology following the CLOS standard. Eieio is licensed under the GPL. You can get more information about eieio at http://www.ultranet.com/~zappo/eieio.shtml -- Takao KAWA

Intent to Package: Selection of Perl/Tk Net Utils

2000-03-19 Thread Alan Ford
I have packaged my selection of Perl/Tk network utils, from: http://www.whirlnet.co.uk/linux/ All are under GPL. I've had a package of these sitting around since June, waiting for new-maintainer to re-open, but now I've become fed up of waiting and this is being sponsored by Edward Betts <[

Intent to Package: abook

2000-03-19 Thread Alan Ford
I intend to package abook (an ncurses address book program): http://www.linuxstart.com/~jheinonen/abook/ License is GPL. I have the package ready. This package is being sponsored by Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Alan Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Intent to package: distmp3

2000-03-17 Thread Robert Woodcock
Hi, distmp3 is a tool to allow encoding of mp3's across a network. It consists of a client perl script and a server perl script. http://wlug.westbo.se/medlprog/distmp3-0.1.5.tar.gz Currently it has no license but I've contacted the upstream author and he will be doing another release shortly that

Intent to Package udmsearch

2000-03-16 Thread Craig Small
udmsearch is a website indexer and, I'm going to package it! More info about it at http://mysearch.udm.net/ -- Craig Small VK2XLZ, PGP: AD 8D D8 63 6E BF C3 C7 47 41 B1 A2 1F 46 EC 90 Eye-Net Consulting http://www.eye-net.com.au/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIEEE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> De

intent to package VTK

2000-03-16 Thread Maitland Bottoms
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I have a start on packaging "The Visualization Toolkit", as described at http://www.kitware.com/vtk.html Interested persons may see my preliminary efforts at http://master.debian.org/~bottoms/debs/ I am accepting comments on my choice of package

Intent to Package: gtkpool

1999-09-26 Thread Chris Waters
gtkpool is a simple simulation of the game of pool (i.e. similar to billiards and snooker), written and copyright 1999 by Jacques Fortier, licensed under the GPL. Because Debian *always* needs more games. -- Chris Waters [EMAIL PROTECTED] | I have a truly elegant proof of the or[EMAIL

Re: Intent to package: src2tex

1999-05-27 Thread Takao KAWAMURA
> > Licence: > > > > Permission to use, copy, and modify this software and its > > documentation is granted under no conditions. > > > > I will upload it to master in a few days. > > "..is granted under no conditions" reads like 'is not granted'. > > I.e., there are no conditions under which su

Re: Let's Debian blow... gracefully! [was Re: Intent to package GNU Philosophy web pages]

1999-05-26 Thread Ivan E. Moore II
On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 05:37:15PM -0400, Fabien Ninoles wrote: > The reason for a seperate directory is for ease of mirroring and CD > building. It gives us also an easy way to check if a package can be > on data. > > I will really like to see this one at least second. It's an old thread > that I

Re: Let's Debian blow... gracefully! [was Re: Intent to package GNU Philosophy web pages]

1999-05-26 Thread shaleh
Seconded, this seems a good solution.

Let's Debian blow... gracefully! [was Re: Intent to package GNU Philosophy web pages]

1999-05-26 Thread Fabien Ninoles
Quoting Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, May 25, 1999 at 10:35:57AM +0100, Edward Betts wrote: > > I changed the description so it does not say it is a mirror anymore: > > > > [..] > > > > Does that help at all? > > Not really, but if enough people really think I'm wrong on this I wo

Intent to package Catalog

1999-05-26 Thread Christophe Le Bars
Catalog is a perl program that allows to create, maintain and display Yahoo! like directories. The user interface is 100% HTML. It requires a MySQL database to run. -- Christophe Le Bars - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10001101010111001010110001101010111001010100011010101110010

Re: Intent to package: src2tex

1999-05-26 Thread Jules Bean
Takao KAWAMURA wrote: > Licence: > > Permission to use, copy, and modify this software and its > documentation is granted under no conditions. > > I will upload it to master in a few days. "..is granted under no conditions" reads like 'is not granted'. I.e., there are no conditions under which

Intent to package: src2tex

1999-05-26 Thread Takao KAWAMURA
Hi, I have packaged src2tex, a converter from source program files to TeX format files. The author of src2tex introduce it in the release note as follows: Roughly speaking, src2tex [resp. src2latex] is a sort of text converter from BASIC, C, C++, OBJECTIVE-C, COBOL, FORTRAN, HTML, JAVA, LISP, MA

Intent to package: trr19

1999-05-26 Thread Takao KAWAMURA
Hi, I have packaged trr19, a GPL'd type training program for GNU Emacs. Though the manual of trr19 is written in Japanese, I think non-Japanese-speaking-people can play with it because it talk to you in English by default. More info about trr19 can be found at http://tje12.is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~y

intent to package

1999-05-26 Thread Wichert Akkerman
I intend to package Gnome Toaster. Here is the description as taken from freshmeat: Gnometoaster is intended to be a full CD creation suite for X11. Although it is in the very early stages of development, it can already be used to copy data, audio, and hybrid cds on the fly or with prec

Re: Intent to package GNU Philosophy web pages

1999-05-26 Thread Joseph Carter
On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 12:47:33AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote: > Having said that, and thought about the packages I maintain, 'jargon' > clearly fits in the above category, and will be withdrawn until there is > an appropriate archive. nah, don't do that. Wait for wichert's proposal when the lo

Re: Intent to package GNU Philosophy web pages

1999-05-26 Thread Steve Greenland
On 25-May-99, 04:35 (CDT), Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 23 May, 1999, Joseph Carter wrote: > > I have the same objection to this I had to the anarchist thing: You're > > trying to package their website. I don't think we should be doing that. > > I changed the description so

Re: Intent to package GNU Philosophy web pages

1999-05-26 Thread Steve Greenland
On 25-May-99, 01:47 (CDT), Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 24 May, 1999, Steve Greenland wrote: > > There are other reasons that free software is good (e.g. the ESR > > utilitarian arguments). Some Debianers might agree with one philosophy, > > others another. If you're going to

Re: Intent to package GNU Philosophy web pages

1999-05-26 Thread Steve Greenland
On 24-May-99, 22:06 (CDT), Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There are other reasons that free software is good (e.g. the ESR > > utilitarian arguments). Some Debianers might agree with one philosophy, > > others another. > > > um.. Debian GNU/Linux > ^^^ > I'd say that's reason eno

Re: Intent to package GNU Philosophy web pages

1999-05-26 Thread Joseph Carter
On Tue, May 25, 1999 at 10:35:57AM +0100, Edward Betts wrote: > I changed the description so it does not say it is a mirror anymore: > > [..] > > Does that help at all? Not really, but if enough people really think I'm wrong on this I won't press the issue. I also didn't press the issue with the

Re: Intent to package GNU Philosophy web pages

1999-05-26 Thread Ron
> And if you want to you can package the ESR view point and upload it. Anyone taking bets as to which will be the first to add a depends on the popularity-contest package ;-)

Intent to package: xplanet

1999-05-25 Thread James Troup
Hi, I packaged xplanet a while ago as I use it at work and I don't like stuff in /usr/local/. | 19:23:[EMAIL PROTECTED]| ~/upload $dpkg -I xplanet_0.1*.deb | new debian package, version 2.0. | size 20520 bytes: control archive= 526 bytes. | 604 bytes,13 lines control

Re: Intent to package GNU Philosophy web pages

1999-05-25 Thread Ben Pfaff
Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Why should they include the GNU view of free software when there are others around? Maybe because we're Debian _GNU_/Linux?

Re: Intent to package GNU Philosophy web pages

1999-05-25 Thread Edward Betts
Another thought, here is the current doc-base file: Document: gnu-philosophy Title: Philosophy of the GNU Project Author: Richard M. Stallman, Georg C. F. Greve, Tom Hull, Kragen Sitaker, Loyd Fueston, Michael Stutz, Bjørn Remseth, and others Abstract: Ideas about free software, and the reasons

Re: Intent to package GNU Philosophy web pages

1999-05-25 Thread Edward Betts
On Sun, 23 May, 1999, Joseph Carter wrote: > I have the same objection to this I had to the anarchist thing: You're > trying to package their website. I don't think we should be doing that. I changed the description so it does not say it is a mirror anymore: new debian package, version 2.0. s

Re: Intent to package GNU Philosophy web pages

1999-05-25 Thread Edward Betts
On Mon, 24 May, 1999, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > On Mon, May 24, 1999 at 06:59:47PM +0100, Edward Betts wrote: > > Why does Debian only accept free software? What is so good about free > > software? It is all explained in this package. > > Indeed. > > > If your objection remains, I will not uploa

Re: Intent to package GNU Philosophy web pages

1999-05-25 Thread Edward Betts
On Mon, 24 May, 1999, Steve Greenland wrote: > On 24-May-99, 12:59 (CDT), Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why does Debian only accept free software? What is so good about free > > software? It is all explained in this package. > > There are other reasons that free software is good (e.

Re: Intent to package GNU Philosophy web pages

1999-05-25 Thread Peter Makholm
Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I don't like Documentation-only packages if they are not specific to Debian. It's the 40 MB atromonical dataset in a smaller scale. > Hmm... perhaps a more catching name like "why-free" would be better? > No-one's going to read "gnu-philosophy" :-) I

Intent to package: elisp-manual-ja, emacs-lisp-intro-ja, emacs-manual-ja

1999-05-25 Thread Takao KAWAMURA
Hi, I have packaged elisp-manual-ja, emacs-lisp-intro-ja, and emacs-manual-ja. These packages contain the Emacs-Lisp manual, Programming in Emacs Lisp, and the Emacs manual translated into Japanese, respectively. I will upload them in a few days. -- Takao KAWAMURA

Intent to package: edb

1999-05-25 Thread Takao KAWAMURA
Hi, I have packaged edb, a GPL'd database program for GNU Emacs. More info about edb can be fount at ftp://theory.lcs.mit.edu/pub/people/mernst/edb/ I will upload it in a few days. -- Takao KAWAMURA

Re: Intent to package GNU Philosophy web pages

1999-05-25 Thread Ron
> > Why does Debian only accept free software? What is so good about free > > software? It is all explained in this package. > > There are other reasons that free software is good (e.g. the ESR > utilitarian arguments). Some Debianers might agree with one philosophy, > others another. um.. Debi

Intent to package: cooledit

1999-05-25 Thread Tom Lear
On Fri, 14 May 1999, Leon Breedt wrote: > Martin Schulze spake thus: > > > I wonder if/when/why not/how/who there is/will be/will package > > the CoolEdit HTML editor? > > The author works for the same company as I do, and asked me to > package it, but I really don't have the time. > > I'd appr

Intent to package: IBM Visualization Data Explorer

1999-05-25 Thread Konstantinos Margaritis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- For info about it, it's on http://www.research.ibm.com/dx/ It's not available in source as yet, it will be on 26/5 (tomorrow that is) so I'll have to wait first for the license to be checked. I suppose I should cross-post this to -legal, right? PS. Cc

NDN(2): Re: Intent to package GNU Philosophy web pages

1999-05-25 Thread Post Office
Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to: Jorge Araya (Mailbox or Conference is full.)

NDN: Re: Intent to package GNU Philosophy web pages

1999-05-25 Thread Post Office
Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to: Jorge Araya (Mailbox or Conference is full.)

Re: Intent to package GNU Philosophy web pages

1999-05-24 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Mon, May 24, 1999 at 06:59:47PM +0100, Edward Betts wrote: > Why does Debian only accept free software? What is so good about free > software? It is all explained in this package. Indeed. > If your objection remains, I will not upload the package. Why? Marcus -- `Rhubarb is no Egyptian g

Re: Intent to package GNU Philosophy web pages

1999-05-24 Thread Steve Greenland
On 24-May-99, 12:59 (CDT), Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why does Debian only accept free software? What is so good about free > software? It is all explained in this package. There are other reasons that free software is good (e.g. the ESR utilitarian arguments). Some Debianers might

NDN: Re: Intent to package GNU Philosophy web pages

1999-05-24 Thread Post Office
Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to: Jorge Araya (Mailbox or Conference is full.)

Re: Intent to package GNU Philosophy web pages

1999-05-24 Thread Edward Betts
On Sun, 23 May, 1999, Joseph Carter wrote: > I have the same objection to this I had to the anarchist thing: You're > trying to package their website. I don't think we should be doing that. > > Granted I'd rather see this website packaged before one trying to tell me > all about the good politic

Intent to Package: FSViewer

1999-05-24 Thread Will Lowe
FSViewer is a NeXT filesystem browser. It's available from someplace under http://www.csn.ul.ie/~clernong/ (I'd give an exact link but I don't seem to be able to connect to that host right now...) Will ---

Re: Intent to package GNU Philosophy web pages

1999-05-24 Thread Joseph Carter
I have the same objection to this I had to the anarchist thing: You're trying to package their website. I don't think we should be doing that. Granted I'd rather see this website packaged before one trying to tell me all about the good political and philosphical things resulting from anarchy, bu

Re: Intent to package GNU Philosophy web pages

1999-05-23 Thread Richard Braakman
Hmm... perhaps a more catching name like "why-free" would be better? No-one's going to read "gnu-philosophy" :-) Richard Braakman

Intent to package GNU Philosophy web pages

1999-05-23 Thread Edward Betts
new debian package, version 2.0. size 570634 bytes: control archive= 2271 bytes. 534 bytes,22 lines control 4932 bytes,56 lines md5sums 191 bytes, 6 lines * postinst #!/bin/sh 171 bytes, 6 lines * prerm

intent to package: vdkbuilder

1999-05-23 Thread Ionutz Borcoman
Hi, (B (BI'm the maintainer of vdk debian package (vdk is a C++ wrapper over gtk) (Band a member of the vdk/vdkbuilder development team. We have released (Bthe vdkbuilder, a nice clone of C++ Builder. Some of the features: (B (B- GPL licence (B- GUI designer (B- Project manager (B- Text Ed

Re: Intent to package KerberosV

1999-05-23 Thread Greg Stark
Bear Giles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My plan, back when I was exploring the idea of a US-only package > and/or derived distribution, was to use shared libraries and create > a special null Kerberos package which would return error codes, something > very close to the Kerberos 'bones' packag

Re: Intent to package: GREED

1999-05-23 Thread Greg Stark
Leon Breedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Regarding curl, I'll be packaging an SSL enabled version only, as it seems > that policy doesnt cover a source package building for both US & non-US. There are a couple packages which do this, mutt-i etc. I think they all make some minor alteration lik

Re: Intent to package: tuxeyes

1999-05-22 Thread Philip Hands
William Ono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > tuXeyes is a X toy that works like xeyes. It is licensed under the GPL > but uses Qt, so it will go into contrib. If it is under the GPL, and is dependent upon Qt, then it has an invalid license, and cannot be distributed. As such it will not be allowe

Re: Intent to package: tuxeyes

1999-05-22 Thread Chris Waters
William Ono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > tuXeyes is a X toy that works like xeyes. It is licensed under the GPL > but uses Qt, so it will go into contrib. Um, no, if it's licensed under the GPL, but links to Qt, then it suffers under the same self-cancelling license issues that KDE does. And we

intent to package: docbook-xml, simplified docbook-xml

1999-05-22 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Since I am interesting in having all the major free SGML stuff included into potato, I intend to package docbook-xml from Norm Walsh (which also includes the simplified docbook-xml DTD). *However*, I am extremely busy as well. If someone else would step forward to package these materials, I'd be

Re: Intent to package: gtk-doc

1999-05-22 Thread Steve Haslam
On Sat, May 22, 1999 at 11:23:36AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Sat, May 22, 1999 at 12:08:00AM +0100, Steve Haslam wrote: > > gtk-doc is the upstream name, but a more distinct name may be > > preferred to distinguish it from gtk+-docs, libgtk1.2-doc, gnome-docu, > > gnome-dev-info... Perhaps "gt

Re: Intent to package: tuxeyes

1999-05-22 Thread William Ono
My appologies for following up to my own post. Although I checked the WNPP [Work-Needing and Prospective Packages] and the debian-devel archives before posting, I was informed by the upstream maintainer that an intent-to-package has already gone out for this package. I checked the archives more

Re: Intent to package: gtk-doc

1999-05-22 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, May 22, 1999 at 12:08:00AM +0100, Steve Haslam wrote: > gtk-doc is the upstream name, but a more distinct name may be > preferred to distinguish it from gtk+-docs, libgtk1.2-doc, gnome-docu, > gnome-dev-info... Perhaps "gtk-doc-tools" ? Maybe keep the source > called gtk-doc and call the bi

Intent to package: tuxeyes

1999-05-22 Thread William Ono
I'm not yet a developer, but should be one soon. If anyone needs this package to be created very quickly, please let me know and I would be happy to give it away. tuXeyes is a X toy that works like xeyes. It is licensed under the GPL but uses Qt, so it will go into contrib. The author writes i

Re: Intent to package: gtk-doc

1999-05-22 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sat, May 22, 1999 at 12:08:00AM +0100, Steve Haslam wrote: > Maybe keep the source called gtk-doc and call the binary gtk-doc-tools... > Suggestions welcome. That sounds good to me, so there's one vote in favor of it. -- G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux |

Intent to package: gtk-doc

1999-05-22 Thread Steve Haslam
gtk-doc is a collection of tools in the GNOME CVS area- gtkdoc-mkdb, gtkdoc-mkhtml, gtkdoc-mkman etc., and one dsssl stylesheet. The gtk-doc tools appear to extract embedded documentation from GNOME source files and convert them to DocBook format (which reminds me a lot of javadoc). The mkman mkht

Intent to package: [Biology] BioPerl

1999-05-21 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
BioPerl is a nice set of Perl modules (not scripts, BioPerl is useful for developers only) to deal with various biological problems. Debian developers will be pleased to learn that BioPerl is a cooperative and anarchistic effort. I subscribed to the debian-perl mailing

Intent to package netspades

1999-05-20 Thread Dan Nguyen
Hi all, NetSpades is a client/server based system designed to be played over a network of some kind. It allows 4 people to play Spades, and chat as well from anywhere in the world. It includes a console client using slang. As well as a gtk based client for X. And if you've got a friend which d

Intent to package: poster

1999-05-20 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
In intend to package poster, a program to scale postscript pages to a given size. The output can be tiled on multiple sheets. License is GPL, thanks to JHM. The only URL I know is ftp://ftp.ics.ele.tue.nl/pub/users/jos/poster/ . -- %%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.ik

Re: Intent to package: device3dfx

1999-05-19 Thread Ben Pfaff
Francesco Tapparo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 09:04:18PM +0100, Steve Haslam wrote: > device3dfx is a kernel module to allow user-space applications (quake > :}) access to 3Dfx cards without needing to be run as root. > > This package consists *only* of a GP

Re: Intent to package: device3dfx

1999-05-19 Thread Francesco Tapparo
On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 09:04:18PM +0100, Steve Haslam wrote: > Hi people, > > device3dfx is a kernel module to allow user-space applications (quake > :}) access to 3Dfx cards without needing to be run as root. > > This package consists *only* of a GPL'd kernel module. As such it can > IMHO go in

Intent to package: GNOME User's Guide, english version

1999-05-19 Thread Martin Bialasinski
Hi, I will package the GNOME User's Guide, as I want to include it with the GNOME update for slink. I will do the english version for now, maybe later the other languages as well. But someone else is free to pick them up. The license is GPL, source is available at http://www.gnome.org/users-guid

Re: Intent to package: apcupsd

1999-05-19 Thread Martin Mitchell
On Wed, 19 May 1999, Remco van de Meent wrote: > Leon Breedt wrote: > > apcupsd is a package to monitor and control APC UPS's. > > May I ask you where I can download its source code? :) http://www.brisse.dk/site/apcupsd/index.htm#TOP > I was looking for it some time ago and wasnt able to find a

Re: Intent to package: apcupsd

1999-05-19 Thread Remco van de Meent
Leon Breedt wrote: > apcupsd is a package to monitor and control APC UPS's. May I ask you where I can download its source code? :) I was looking for it some time ago and wasnt able to find any sources of relatively new versions of apcupsd. Anyways, great to have this package in Debian. Regard

Re: Intent to package: device3dfx

1999-05-19 Thread Steve Haslam
On Wed, May 19, 1999 at 03:52:11AM -0400, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote: > One other problem, it needs big warnings, anyone with access to the > device can crash the machine no problem... > > Its vaguely possible that it could also allow more, however I've never > seen anyone mention such.. Someone nee

Intent to package: apcupsd

1999-05-19 Thread Leon Breedt
apcupsd is a package to monitor and control APC UPS's. Leon -- Leon Breedt | Developer, Obsidian Systems Debian/GNU Linux| Because you want to get there...Today Debian Developer| [EMAIL PROTECTED] Make it

Re: intent to package pa-risc stuff

1999-05-19 Thread Martin Schulze
Justin Maurer wrote: > > Justin, can you find out if those machines are binary compatible. > > I've heard that there are two general types flying around (5i and > > 3i, iirc). I wonder if one new architecture is enough or if we > > need both - like for mips. > > which two machines? the ones the p

Re: Intent to package: device3dfx

1999-05-19 Thread Zephaniah E. Hull
One other problem, it needs big warnings, anyone with access to the device can crash the machine no problem... Its vaguely possible that it could also allow more, however I've never seen anyone mention such.. Zephaniah E. Hull.. On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 09:04:18PM +0100, Steve Haslam wrote: > Hi

Intent to package: device3dfx

1999-05-19 Thread Steve Haslam
Hi people, device3dfx is a kernel module to allow user-space applications (quake :}) access to 3Dfx cards without needing to be run as root. This package consists *only* of a GPL'd kernel module. As such it can IMHO go into main. It could be argued that you can only use it via the Glide libraries

Re: intent to package pa-risc stuff

1999-05-18 Thread Joel Klecker
At 14:56 -0400 1999-05-18, Ben Collins wrote: On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 01:45:04PM -0500, Justin Maurer wrote: well, for the cross compilers, i'm doing /usr/lib/parisc-xxx e.g, /usr/bin/parisc-egcs /usr/bin/parisc-as etc. You should really use standard gnu style, such as parisc-linux-{gcc,as,ld,...}

Re: intent to package pa-risc stuff

1999-05-18 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 01:45:04PM -0500, Justin Maurer wrote: > well, for the cross compilers, i'm doing /usr/lib/parisc-xxx > e.g, > /usr/bin/parisc-egcs > /usr/bin/parisc-as > etc. You should really use standard gnu style, such as parisc-linux-{gcc,as,ld,...} and /usr/parisc-linux/{lib,bin,incl

Re: intent to package pa-risc stuff

1999-05-18 Thread Justin Maurer
>> (me saying a bootable kernel is still quite aways off) > I wonder if this ITP is a little bit early then... well, sort of. i can still package the cross compilers and such, so that we will all be ready for it. but the new arch obviously is still another relase or two away. i have binutils pa

Re: intent to package pa-risc stuff

1999-05-18 Thread Martin Schulze
Justin Maurer wrote: > consider this my intent to package pa-risc egcs and binutils. the kernel, > when > one arrives, too. i speak with the puffins (www.thepuffingroup.com, for those > who don't know) on a daily basis, so i suppose i am a good candidate. i plan > to or

Intent to package xmanpages-ja

1999-05-18 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
Hi, everyone. I'm now packaging "Japanese translated version of X related manpages". These manpages has been translated by "X Japanese Document Project" (http://xjman.dsl.gr.jp. Sorry written in Japanese only). I'm member of this project. This version is based on XFree86 3.3.3.1 manpages. I

Intent to package: Puzzle ([Biology] Reconstruction of phylogenetic trees)

1999-05-18 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
[Please Cc: my personal address, I'm far from my normal mail and have difficulties reading Debian lists.] [Cc: to debian-legal because there is a small legal problem. Advices about it should go to debian-legal, not debian-devel.] I intent to package the Puzzle program, which is a bi

Intent to package asmon

1999-05-17 Thread Brian E. Ermovick
Hrmm -- I maintain wmsysmon, but am always looking around the dockapps, and ran across asmon the other day, which looks kinda like a combination of wmmon and wmsysmon -- it has the best parts of each... Needless to say, it's the one on my wmaker desktop now *grin* -- so unless somebody else is work

Re: intent to package PortSentry

1999-05-16 Thread Rene Mayrhofer
Am Sun, 16 May 1999 schrieb Samu: > i'd like to make the debian packages of portSentry by www.psionic.com > is there another one working on it ? I did it already and I am working on logcheck now. However, I am not a registered debian developer at the moment (I'm planning to register). If you have a

intent to package PortSentry

1999-05-16 Thread Samu
i'd like to make the debian packages of portSentry by www.psionic.com is there another one working on it ? c ya -- Samuele Tonon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Undergraduate Student of Computer Science at University of Bologna, Italy 1024-bit key, key ID D739FA25 Key fingerprint = 95 5A 81 FB D2 1

Re: Intent to package Gnofin

1999-05-15 Thread Darin Fisher
thanks!! i will send you mail whenever i update the source. darin On Sat, 15 May 1999, Torsten Landschoff wrote: > Hi Darin! > > I was seeking for a tiny finance tracking tool to make better use of my money > and found Gnofin on freshmeat. I learned that there is no Debian package for > it s

Re: Intent to package: ttfprint

1999-05-15 Thread Anthony Wong
On Fri, May 14, 1999 at 05:15:42PM -0400, Sergey V Kovalyov wrote: | |On Sat, 15 May 1999, Anthony Wong wrote: | |> The package 'ttfprint' is ready for upload: | |Interesting... Is it specific to Chinese, or can it do other truetype |stuff ? E.g. Russian ? Yes, ttfprint is specific to Chinese beca

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >