In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 11:36:21AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>>
>> In addition, we have at least two other machines which are available
>> to developers:
>>
>> pergolesi.debian.org -- admin is debian-admin (and all de
On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 11:36:21AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>
> In addition, we have at least two other machines which are available
> to developers:
>
> pergolesi.debian.org -- admin is debian-admin (and all developers have
> accounts already)
Currently, this machin
* Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader
| * Chasecreek Systemhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-12-10 20:56]:
| > > agreed to set up the machine, host it for a while and give interested
| > > developers access. This box is not a general .debian.org
| >
| > Is this by invitation only?
|
| Debia
* Chasecreek Systemhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-12-10 20:56]:
> > agreed to set up the machine, host it for a while and give interested
> > developers access. This box is not a general .debian.org
>
> Is this by invitation only?
Debian developers will not automatically get access (since it's
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 00:27:38 +, Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project
Leader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> agreed to set up the machine, host it for a while and give interested
> developers access. This box is not a general .debian.org
Is this by invitation only?
--
WC -Sx- Jones
http://insecuri
Over the last few weeks, I have been in discussion with Intel about
getting an EM64T system for Debian. They agreed to give a system on
loan to us for 6 months (or possibly longer if we make good use of it)
and after some legal issues were clarified (thanks to Greg Pomerantz
of SPI), the machine i
6 matches
Mail list logo
