Re: install report for Debian 2.1 and some comments on installation profiles

1999-05-11 Thread Martin Bialasinski
>> "ADC" == Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ADC> Martin Bialasinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> This is exactly the thing the equivs package will do. ADC> Does equivs implement this through skullduggery, or does it make ADC> nice metapackages which play nice? Well, It could be exte

Re: install report for Debian 2.1 and some comments on installation profiles

1999-05-11 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Enrique Zanardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Voila. Elegant, uses the existing packaging system (i.e., no need to > > skip the select step in dselect), > > This is the main point against your approach. We introduced the tasks and > profiles to avoid going through the list of 3000 packages in

Re: install report for Debian 2.1 and some comments on installation profiles

1999-05-11 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Martin Bialasinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This is exactly the thing the equivs package will do. Does equivs implement this through skullduggery, or does it make nice metapackages which play nice? -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>

Re: install report for Debian 2.1 and some comments on installation profiles

1999-05-11 Thread Martin Bialasinski
>> "EZ" == Enrique Zanardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: EZ> with its changelog, control file, rules file and so on...). That EZ> may probably be fixed by implementing a debhelper tool just for EZ> building metapackages. This is exactly the thing the equivs package will do. Ciao, Martin

Re: install report for Debian 2.1 and some comments on installation profiles

1999-05-10 Thread Enrique Zanardi
On Sun, May 09, 1999 at 04:08:34PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > [Talking about tasks and profile from boot-floppies] > > > "brandon" == Brandon Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > brandon> I'd personally like to see a way to easily add a profile via > brandon> dpkg -get-selections and

Re: install report for Debian 2.1 and some comments on installation profiles

1999-05-09 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Brandon Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [ woah, this is an old thread, but a good one to bring back. ] Heh... yeah, I keep around email that I want to reply to, even though it sometimes takes a month or so before I get a chance. > Yes, the next frontend to apt (gnome-apt?) should handle t

Re: install report for Debian 2.1 and some comments on installation profiles

1999-05-09 Thread Brandon Mitchell
On 9 May 1999, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > [Talking about tasks and profile from boot-floppies] > > > "brandon" == Brandon Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > brandon> I'd personally like to see a way to easily add a profile via > brandon> dpkg -get-selections and make for a cookie cutter inst

Re: install report for Debian 2.1 and some comments on installation profiles

1999-05-09 Thread Adam Di Carlo
[Talking about tasks and profile from boot-floppies] > "brandon" == Brandon Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: brandon> I'd personally like to see a way to easily add a profile via brandon> dpkg -get-selections and make for a cookie cutter install brandon> (think large labs). Eh... I don'

Re: Installation Profiles [was: Re: Reality check!]

1999-02-01 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Saturday 30 January 1999, at 16 h 41, the keyboard of Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okay, let's be serious again: unfortunately this actually means that > some of the most obvious installation profiles of slink stay to be > unnecessarily bloated. Giving the

Re: Installation Profiles

1999-01-31 Thread James R. Van Zandt
Jonathan P Tomer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >a possibility i considered: divide user-space...packages into >heirarchical groups (structure identical or similar to the debian >menus, possibly?). have a level wherein the user selects any of these >he wants; it will be easy to skip those things he

Re: Installation Profiles [was: Re: Reality check!]

1999-01-31 Thread Jonathan P Tomer
> Might it be possible to include fewer packages in each profile and then > present the user with a list of additional packages that might be of > interest to them given that they have chosen this particular profile? > Something like "You have installed the Scientific Workstation profile. The > fo

Re: Installation Profiles [was: Re: Reality check!]

1999-01-30 Thread John Hasler
Paul Seelig writes: > Myself i do prefer XEmacs over all other variants but wouldn't mind if > i had to install it later on my own. I prefer emacs, bu I also wouldn't mind if > i had to install it later on my own. In fact, I would not mind at all if emacs was optional. > IMHO it would be much wi

Re: Installation Profiles [was: Re: Reality check!]

1999-01-30 Thread M.C. Vernon
us again: unfortunately this actually means that > some of the most obvious installation profiles of slink stay to be > unnecessarily bloated. I consider this to be a bad move because the > initial install is something like Debian's advertisement plate (or > visiting card) and the in