Hello,
On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 20:26:47 +0100
Michael Biebl wrote:
> > On 6 March 2013 13:45, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> A quick grep over all unpacked packages shipping ifupdown hooks
> >> show 60 hook scripts which don't have ADDRFAM set.
> >> I haven't checked them individually, though.
> > They
Hi,
On 06.03.2013 15:21, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 6 March 2013 13:45, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> A quick grep over all unpacked packages shipping ifupdown hooks show 60
>> hook scripts which don't have ADDRFAM set.
>> I haven't checked them individually, though.
>
> They usually check
On 06.03.2013 00:20, Steve Langasek wrote:
> FWIW, I agree with Andrew that this isn't an interface change; this is a
> latent bug in the avahi hook which has merely been exposed by this behavior
> change in ifupdown. ifupdown supports more address families than ipv4 and
> ipv6 (specifically, it
Hi Joss,
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 08:39:45PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> while investigating on #699749 (which apparently affects many machines
> using NM, but not all of them), I discovered that the interface for
> ifupdown hooks has changed since squeeze.
> >From the manpage:
>Whe
Hi,
while investigating on #699749 (which apparently affects many machines
using NM, but not all of them), I discovered that the interface for
ifupdown hooks has changed since squeeze.
>From the manpage:
When ifupdown is being called with the --all option, before doing any‐
thing
5 matches
Mail list logo
