El vie, 07-12-2007 a las 10:57 +0100, Bernd Zeimetz escribió:
> > * License : MIT
>
> hmm, on a fast look trough the tarball all I found was
> - a LICENSE file, with a license from Apple
> - a COPYING file, with a license which seems to be written by squeak
> (starts pretty ugly, didn't re
El jue, 06-12-2007 a las 23:00 +0100, Daniel Baumann escribió:
> squeak is supposed[0] to be unable to package for debian due to legal
> reasons. can you elaborate on the current status?
>
> [0] http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/unable-to-package
>
Sure:
Squeak is being relicensed from the old Ap
> * License : MIT
hmm, on a fast look trough the tarball all I found was
- a LICENSE file, with a license from Apple
- a COPYING file, with a license which seems to be written by squeak
(starts pretty ugly, didn't read it, though).
- a COPYRIGHT file which contains the GPL2
and no licens
squeak is supposed[0] to be unable to package for debian due to legal
reasons. can you elaborate on the current status?
[0] http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/unable-to-package
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: José L. Redrejo Rodríguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: squeak-vm
Version : 3.9-12
Upstream Author : Ian Piumarta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.squeakvm.org/unix
* License : MIT
Description : Virtual m
5 matches
Mail list logo