Re: ITO: catdoc

2000-12-28 Thread Dr. Guenter Bechly
msg.pgp Description: PGP message

Re: ITO: catdoc

2000-12-27 Thread Peter Novodvorsky
So, it seems that I will maintain catdoc, not you? Am I right? Thanks, NIDD -- The Debian Project. Debian [EMAIL PR

Re: ITO: catdoc

2000-12-27 Thread Sam TH
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 10:47:17PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: > > Hello, > > On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 11:18:54AM -0600, Sam TH wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 12:25:54PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: > > > just wanted to point to wv which seems to do a much better > > > job than catdoc, and also o

Re: ITO: catdoc

2000-12-27 Thread Dr. Guenter Bechly
msg.pgp Description: PGP message

Re: ITO: catdoc

2000-12-27 Thread Peter Novodvorsky
++ 28/12/00 00:51 +0300 - Peter Novodvorsky: > ++ 27/12/00 16:03 +0100 - Dr. Guenter Bechly: > > Oops, I already adopted the package on 24th Dec. Sorry, but I did not know > > that anybody else was interested in adopting it. It had announced my ITA a > > day before. > > I have upload catdoc only k

Re: ITO: catdoc

2000-12-27 Thread Peter Novodvorsky
++ 27/12/00 16:03 +0100 - Dr. Guenter Bechly: > Oops, I already adopted the package on 24th Dec. Sorry, but I did not know > that anybody else was interested in adopting it. It had announced my ITA a > day before. I have upload catdoc only know and closed the bug. sorry.

Re: ITO: catdoc

2000-12-27 Thread Toni Mueller
Hello, On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 11:18:54AM -0600, Sam TH wrote: > On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 12:25:54PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: > > just wanted to point to wv which seems to do a much better > > job than catdoc, and also operates from a script if desired. > > Apparently only the GUI is "missing".

Re: ITO: catdoc

2000-12-27 Thread Sam TH
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 12:25:54PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: > > > Hello, > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 12:10:19AM +0300, Peter Novodvorsky wrote: > > ++ 20/12/00 12:52 -0700 - Bdale Garbee: > > > I am no longer interested in maintaining the 'catdoc' package. However, I > > > will continue my cu

Re: ITO: catdoc

2000-12-27 Thread Dr. Guenter Bechly
Hi, > > > I am no longer interested in maintaining the 'catdoc' package. However, I > > > will continue my current level of inactive ownership of the package until > > > such time as someone takes it over. > > I'd like to adopt this package. Oops, I already adopted the package on 24th Dec. Sorry

Re: ITO: catdoc

2000-12-27 Thread Toni Mueller
Hello, On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 12:10:19AM +0300, Peter Novodvorsky wrote: > ++ 20/12/00 12:52 -0700 - Bdale Garbee: > > I am no longer interested in maintaining the 'catdoc' package. However, I > > will continue my current level of inactive ownership of the package until > > such time as someon